Notary's Responsibility for the Criminal Act of Forgery of Authentic Deeds (Study of Decision Number 1003 K/Pid/2015)
Abstract
Notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and other authorities as referred to in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. This study aims to analyze the responsibility of notaries for the criminal act of forgery of authentic deeds with a case study in Decision Number 1003 K/Pid/2015. The main focus of this study is to understand the legal position of notaries in the context of making authentic deeds and the legal implications that arise if forgery occurs. In addition, this study also explores aspects of criminal and civil law related to the responsibility of notaries in carrying out their duties, in order to provide recommendations for legal protection for the injured parties. The research method used is a normative legal approach by examining laws and regulations and case approaches, legal doctrines, and case studies of court decisions. Data were collected through literature studies and analysis of related legal documents. The analysis was carried out descriptively qualitatively to obtain a comprehensive picture of the notary's responsibility in cases of forgery of authentic deeds. The results of the study indicate that notaries have legal responsibilities both civilly, criminally, and administratively in making authentic deeds. Decision Number 1003 K/Pid/2015 reveals that forgery of authentic deeds can result in criminal sanctions for notaries who are proven to be negligent or intentionally violating the law. From this study, it is recommended that there be strengthening of regulations and supervision of the notary profession in order to prevent abuse of authority in making authentic deeds.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjie Habib , 2017, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung, PT Refika Aditama.
Adjie, Habib, 2008, Hukum Notaris di Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang- Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Bandung, Refika Aditama.
Aliman , Laurensius S, 2015, Buku Notaris dan Penegakan Hukum oleh Hakim, Yogyakarta, Deepublish.
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2010 , Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Press.
Astuti, Budi dan M. Rusdi Daud, 2023, Kepastian Hukum Pengaturan Transportasi Online, Al-Qisth Law Review, vol. 6 No. 2.
Doly, Denico, 2011, Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta yang berhubungan dengan Tanah, Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2.
Ghofur , Abdul ,2009, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Yogyakarta, UUI Press.
Harahap, Krisna ,2009, Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Menuju Perubahan ke-5, Bandung, Grafiti Budi Utami.
Jaya, I Wayan Paramarta , dkk, 2017, Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Berkenaan dengan Kebenaran Substansi Akta Otentik, Jurnal Rechtidee, Vol. 12, No. 2.
Kanter, E.Y. dan S.R. Sianturi, 2002, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Jakarta, Storia Grafika.
Kie, Tan Thong, 2000, Studi Notariat Serba Sebi Praktek Notaris, Jakarta, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Moeljatno, 1984 , “Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana”, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta, Bina Aksara.
Notodisoerjo, R.Soegondo ,1982, Hukum Natariat Di Indonesia–Suatu Penjelasan, Jakarta , Rajawali Pers.
Priyatno, Dwidja, 2004, Kebijakan Legislasi tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia, Bandung , CV. Utomo.
Wiradiredja, Hilda Sophia , 2015, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Didasarkan Pada Keterangan Palsu Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Dan Kuhp, Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, Vol. 32, No. 1.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id