Liability of a Notary Who Intentionally Include False Information in an Authentic Deed

Suci Rahmadhani, Achmad Arifullah

Abstract


Abstract. A notary is a public official who is trusted by the public to make authentic deeds. The authentic deed is used as evidence, an authentic deed regarding all acts, agreements, and determinations required by laws and regulations or desired by the interested party. The notary is obliged to ensure that what is contained in the deed has been truly understood and is in accordance with the wishes of the parties, namely by reading it, so that the contents of the deed become clear and provide access to related information for the parties in signing the deed. The reality in society is that many parties are found to provide data and information that does not correspond to the reality to the notary in making a deed. The theories used in this study are the Theory of Legal Certainty, Theory of Legal Responsibility, and Theory of the Working of Law. To find out the above objectives, the author uses normative juridical legal research. Data sources are obtained through several stages, namely library research. Data analysis is qualitative and presented descriptively, namely explaining, describing, and describing according to the problems that are closely related to this study. Based on the research results, it was concluded that, first, the birth of a Notary's responsibility cannot be separated from the obligations and authorities held. A Notary is charged with responsibility for the formal and material truth of the deed he made if the Notary is proven in court that the Notary committed negligence or intentional acts to the detriment of the parties. Second, an authentic Deed as evidence in this proof is needed to provide clarity and legal certainty regarding events, circumstances, or legal acts that can be carried out through the making of a deed before a Notary. A deed can be canceled. This must first be ratified or a court decision stating that the deed is void and its legal consequences will apply since the ratification or court decision cancels the deed.

Keywords: Authentic; Certainty; Legal; Notary.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adji, Habib, 2010, Majelis Pengawas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara, Surabaya, Refika Aditama.

Adjie, Habib, 2011, Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris, Bandung, Refika Aditama

Budiono, Herlin, 2018, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Bandung, Citra Aditya.

Kie, Tan Thong, 2000, Study Notariat, Serba-serbi Parktek Notaris, Jakarta, PT Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Nuraeny, Henny, 2022, Tindak pidana perdagangan orang kebijakan hukum pidana dan pencegahannya. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika

Utomo, Hatta Isnaini Wahyu, 2019, Memahami Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah, Yogyakarta, Phoenix Publisher

Yin, Robet K., 2008, dalam bukunya yang berjudul Studi Kasus, Desain & Metode, Edisi 1, cet 12, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ayuningtyas, Pratiwi, 2020, Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melanggar Kode Etik, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol.9 No.2.

Mowoka, Valentine Phebe, 2014, Pelaksanan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya, Lex et Societatis, Vol.II No.4.

Siregar, R. J., Simamora, S. F., Gultom, M. H., & Situmorang, S., 2024, PENDEKATAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PEMIDANAAN DI INDONESIA, Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, Vol.5 No.4.

Zainuddin, M, & Karina, A. D, 2023, Penggunaan Metode Yuridis Normatif Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Pada Penelitian Hukum, Smart Law Journal, 2(2).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id