Responsibility of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) as Participants in The Issue of Sale and Purchase Deeds Cancelled By The Court in West Jakarta

Yurizal Akmal, Sugiharto Sugiharto

Abstract


Abstract. This study aims to determine and analyze the form of implementation of accountability. the answer from the land deed making official (PPAT) as a participating party legal actions regarding the deed of sale and purchase made in West Jakarta and knowing and analyzing the legal consequences of the cancellation of the deed of sale and purchase of land made before the land deed making official (PPAT) by the West Jakarta Court. The results of the research and discussion in this study are: The form of implementation of the responsibility of the land deed making official (PPAT) as a party involved in the legal act on the deed of sale and purchase made in West Jakarta can be seen from the PPAT who carried out the transfer of land rights by making a Deed of Sale and Purchase which was based on a legally flawed due to the deviation of the principle of carelessness of the PPAT in carrying out his position. So that in this study it can be seen that F., SH, M.Kn. and IR, SH, M.Kn. are categorized as parties involved in the legal act on the deed of sale and purchase where it is categorized as joint participation in falsifying authentic documents and money laundering on the deed which is a legal product made so that the defendants are burdened with principal and additional criminal penalties which result in the deed being declared null and void by law and the legal consequences of the cancellation of the deed of sale and purchase of land made before the land deed making official (PPAT) by the West Jakarta court are that it is declared null and void (niegtigheid van rechtswege) and all are returned to their original state to the late. CIM, which in this case is the heir of the deceased, is back to NZ Zubir, where due to the carelessness of the PPAT in making its legal product based on the decision Number: 248 / P \ Pid.B / 2022 / PN Jkt.Brt and is burdened with imprisonment for 2 years and 8 months each, a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000, - (one billion rupiah) but if the fine is not paid then it is replaced with imprisonment for 1 month each.

Keywords: Accountability, PPAT, Participation, Making AJB


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi.A.A.Prajitno, (2010), Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia?, Surabaya: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Achmad Rubaie, (2007), Hukum Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum, Malang: Bayu Media.

Agustina, A. (2016). Penandatanganan Akta Jual Beli Yang Didasari Atas Blangko Kosong, (Contoh Kasus : Putusan MA No. 1201/K/Pdt/2016 ). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol.1, (No.1), hal.14.

Boedi Harsono, (2008). Hukum Agraria Indonesia Jilid 1 “Hukum Tanah Nasional”, Jakarta: Djambatan.

Djoko Sukisno, 2008, Pengambilan Fotocopy Minuta Akta dan Pemanggilan Notaris, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum vol.20 nomor 1, hal.52

Debora Riny Lumolos, Peran Camat sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) sementara di Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado, http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/2365 pada tanggal 27 Agustus 2024, pukul 11.00 WIB.

Dian Indrawati (et.al), Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Lahan Antara Masyarakat Lokal Pekon Sukapura dengan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup & Kehutanan (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Sukapura, Kecamatan Sumberjaya, Kabupaten Lampung Barat), Administrativa: Jurnal Birokrat, Kebijakan, dan Pelayanan Publik, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022, hal.84

Gunawan Wijaya, (2002), Jual Beli, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

https://www.kompas.tv/entertainment/319597/3-notaris-ppat-divonis-ringan-kakak-N.Z.-zubir-kecewa-ragu-mafia-tanah-bisa-dilawan diakses pada tanggal 29 Agustus 2024 pukul 13.23 WIB.

Habib Adjie, (2017), Memahami dan Menguasai Teori Akta Notaris Ragam Awal Akta, Komparasi dan Akhir Akta Notaris, Semarang : Nuta Nusinda.

Kevin Hernando Pratama, 2021, Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (Ppat) Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Tanpa Sepengetahuan Dan Persetujuan Pemilik Objek Dalam Putusan Nomor 347/Pdt.G/2017/ Pn.Jkt.Tim, Jurnal Hukum Agima, Volume 4 Nomor 2, Hal.719. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/article/download/13647/8336/40939.

Nurhayati, 2019, “Fungsi Pendaftaran Tanah Terhadap Hak-Hak Atas Tanah Menurut UUPA Tahun 1960”, Jurnal Warta, Edisi: 60, hal. 59.

Soedharyo Soimin, (2008), Status Hak dan Pembebasan Tanah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Urip Santoso, 2016, Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Perspektif Regulasi, Wewenang, dan Sifat Akta, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadiamedia Group, hal. 94.

Wawancara Putu Asti Nurtjahjati, S.H., M.Kn, selaku Pejabat pembuat Akta Tanah dengan daerah kerja Wilayah Jakarta Selatan yang dilakukan pada tanggal 21 November 2024 pukul 20.15 WIB.

Wawancara dengan Sumiyati, S.H., M.Kn. selaku Pejabat Pembuat Akta tanah dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dengan daerah kerja Wilayah Kayong Utara, dilaksanakan pada tanggal 15 November 2024 pukul 19.00 WIB.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id