The Notary Legal Protection in Criminal Cases Related to Authentic Fiduciary Deeds

Mokhamad Hussain Adillah

Abstract


Criminal cases related to authentic fiduciary deed can position the notary as a witness, suspect and even the accused which shows that the notary has no legal immunity. This research is about Legal Protection of Notaries in Criminal Cases Related to Authentic Fiduciary Deeds, which aims to find out and analyze the position of notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed they made and their legal protection. This study uses a sociological juridical approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews and literature study. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner. This research shows that a notary in a criminal case related to a fiduciary deed he made can serve as a witness or perpetrator of a crime as stipulated in Article 35 of Act No. 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.participating in criminal acts (Article 55 of the Criminal Code), assisting perpetrators in committing crimes (Article 231 of the Criminal Code), making fake letters (Article 263 of the Criminal Code), providing false statements in authentic deeds (Article 266 of the Criminal Code), embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code), and fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) which causes harm to other parties, the notary can be held criminally responsible.Legal protection for notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed he made namelyafter the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 namely the summons of a notary through the Notary Honorary Council according to Article 66 UUJN. In addition, notaries still receive protection from the rights and obligations of notary disobeying as referred to in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code and Article 322 of the Criminal Code.
Keywords: Criminal; Fiduciary; Protection.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Nawaaf dan Chalim, Munsyarif Abdul, “Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Otentikâ€, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 4 December 2017.

Jalal, Abdul; Suwitno; Wahyuningsih, Sri Endah, “Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan dalam Pemalsuan Dokumenâ€, Jurnal Akta, Vol 5 No 1 March 2018.

Mansyur, Andi Ahmad Suhar, “Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik yang Dilakukan Oleh Notarisâ€, Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 2013. 2-30

Mawartiningsih, Anny dan Maryanto, â€Tinjauan Yuridis Praktek Pembuatan Akta Notaris dalam Hal Penghadap Menghadap Dalam Kurun Waktu dan Tempat Yang Berbedaâ€, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 2 June 2017.

Nurlete, Maimunah, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Palsu Berdasarkan Pelanggaran Jenis Norma dan Sanksinya. (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang Nomor 244/PID.B/PN.TJK)â€, Indonesia Notary, 2 (2020).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id