The Legal Consequences of Applying the Principle of Balance to Grant Agreements Waarmarked by Notaries

Agam Soedijono

Abstract


The development of contract law gave birth to a new principle, namely the principle of balance which states that an agreement is binding as long as it is based on a balance of interests between the parties. Agreement law in Indonesia recognizes grant agreements, namely unilateral agreements that only show the achievements of one party. The emergence of the principle of balance then raises issues which are the main focus of writing this law, related to the application and legal consequences in the grant agreement Number: 536/Waarmer/IV/201, April 6, 202 Notary PPAT Arif Indra Setyadi SH. MKn. Although there are no provisions governing the application of the principle of balance in Indonesian contract law, the application of the principle of balance is indirectly contained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The emphasis is on "agreement", "execution in good faith" and the binding agreement with "decency, custom and law" shows that in an agreement there should be a balance between the parties so as to create a sense of justice. An unbalanced agreement does not have binding power because it is contrary to good faith, a sense of justice and propriety. As a result, an unbalanced agreement can be requested for cancellation of the agreement.

Keywords: Agreement; Balance; Grant; Waarmerking.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie. Habib, (2009) Meneropong Khazanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia (Kumpulan Tulisan tentang Notaris dan PPAT), Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Affandi. Ali, (2000), Hukum Hukum Waris Hukum Keluarga Pembuktian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. (2011), Filsafat Hukum Hibah dan Wasiat di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Badrulzaman. Mariam Darus, (2014) Aneka Hukum Bisnis, Bandung : Penerbit Alumni.

Budiono. Herlien, (2015), Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti

Hadisoeprapto. Hartono, (1984), Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan & Hukum Jaminan, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hartono. Sunaryati, (1994), Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia, Alumni

Hernoko. Agus Yudha, (2008), Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersil, Laksbang Mediatama.

Ibrahim. Johnny, (2013), Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing.

Kansil. C.S.T., (2002), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.

Kohar. A., (1984), Notaris Berkomunikasi, Bandung: Alumni.

Meliala. Djaja S., (2007), Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Tentang Benda dan Hukum Perikatan, Nuansa Aulia.

Mertokusumo. Sudikno, (2003), Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Liberty.

Muhammad. Abdulkadir, (1982), Hukum Perikatan, Bandung : Penerbit Alumni.

Muhammad. Abdulkadir, (2000), Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Novita. Rut, (2012), Tesis, “Analisis Yuridis Cacat Hukum Dalam Hibah Sebagai Perjanjian Sepihak dan Implikasinyaâ€, Depok: UI.

Orades. Mulya Darma, (2016), Hukum Agraria, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Projodikoro. Wirjono, (1989), Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung : Bale.

Saefullahwiradipradja. E., (2015), Penuntun Praktis Metode Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Hukum, Keni Media.

Subekti, (1982). Aneka Perjanjian, Bandung: Alumni.

Subekti, (2003), Pokok – Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: PT.Intermesa.

Subekti, (2005), Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: PT.Intermasa.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id