legal Analysis of Criminal Responsibility of Perpetrators of Assault Due to Forced Defense (Noodweer) (Decision Study Number: 938 K/Pid/2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.3.3957-3974Kata Kunci:
Assault, Criminal Liability, Forced Defense, New Criminal Code.Abstrak
Abuse is a criminal act against the body that can cause physical suffering, injury, and even death. In practice, legal issues become complex when acts of abuse are committed in a state of forced defense (noodweer), because on the one hand the act fulfills the elements of a crime, but on the other hand it is carried out to defend protected legal interests. This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators of criminal acts of abuse committed in a state of forced defense, as well as examine the application of the provisions of Article 49 of the Criminal Code and its provisions in the new Criminal Code (Law Number 1 of 2023). This study uses a normative legal research method with a normative juridical approach, which includes both a statutory and a conceptual approach. The data used is secondary data obtained through literature review, examining laws and regulations, books, and various other sources relevant to the problem under study. The results of the study show that the defense of necessity as regulated in Article 49 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code is a justification that eliminates the unlawful nature of the act, while the defense of excessive necessity is a forgiving reason that eliminates the perpetrator's guilt. The provisions in the new Criminal Code basically maintain this substance with a more systematic formulation to guarantee legal certainty and justice
Referensi
Journals:
Achmad Ali, 2010, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) & Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Volume I Pemahaman Awal, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Halimah Annisaa Taufiq, Telaah Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan, Jurnal Verstek Volume 10 Issue 4, 2022.
Krisnha Gumelar, 2021, Keguncangan Jiwa sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana: Dilema antara Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, Jurnal Hukum dan SYari’ah Kejaksaan Neeri Singaraja Bali, Vol. 1 (1).
Rendy Marselino, Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) pada Pasal 49 ayat (2), Jurist Diction Volume 3 Nomor 2, Maret 2020.
Books:
Andi Hamzah, 1997, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Andi Zainal Abidin, 1987, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama, Alumni, Bandung.
Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Bambang Waluyo, 1996, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Departemen P dan K, 1989, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Desy Anwar, 2003, Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia, Amelia, Surabaya.
H.M Hamdan, 2013, Alasan Penghapus Pidana (Teori Dan Studi Kasus), PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Hilman Adikusuma, 2001, Hukum Perekonomian Adat Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Jan Remmelink, 2003, Hukum Pidana: Komentar Atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, 2009, Buku Referensi Penanganan Kasus-Kasus Terhadap Perempuan di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum, Komnas Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, Jakarta.
Leden Mapaung, 2005, Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafrika, Jakarta.
Moeljatno, 2009, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Muhamad Erwin, 2016, Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi), PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
O.Notohamidjojo, 2011, Soal-Soal Pokok Filsafat Hukum, Griya Media, Salatiga.
Oemar Seno Adji, 1991, Etika Profesional dan Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dokter, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
P.A.F Lamintang, 2012, Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, Dan Kesehatan, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
R. Soesilo, 1988, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia, Bogor.
Ramly Hutabarat, 1985, Persamaan Dihadapan Hukum “Equality Before the Law” di Indonesia, Ghia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Riduan Syahrani, 1999, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Roeslan Saleh, 1990, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.
Ronny Hanitjo Soemitro, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Salim HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 2009, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis, Buku Kedua, Rajawali Pres, Jakarta.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2012, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Soerjono Soekanto,1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI-Press, Jakarta.
Soeroso, 2011, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Sri Sumawarni, 2012, Sebuah Seri Metode Penelitian Hukum, UPT UNDIP Press, Semarang.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1999, Mengenal Hukum, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Sugandhi, R, 1980, KUHP dan Penjelasannya, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1989, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Eresco, Bandung.
Wiryono Prodjodikiro, 1986, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Sumur Bandung, Bandung.
Regulation:
Criminal Code.
Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).
Decision No. 938 K/ Pid/ 2022
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the National Criminal Code
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
