Effectiveness of Termination of Prosecution of Ordinary Theft Crime Cases Based on Restorative Justice (Case Study at Jembrana District Attorney's Office)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25pKata Kunci:
Asset, Embezzlement, Recovery.Abstrak
Indonesia as a country of law guarantees the rights of victims to recover losses due to criminal acts, but in practice, victims of property crimes such as in the Abu Tours case which lost more than IDR 1.2 trillion, often have to take civil action to recover their rights because criminal sanctions do not automatically restore losses. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the optimization of victim loss recovery in handling cases of embezzlement and money laundering of umrah costs; to analyze obstacles and solutions to victim loss recovery in handling cases of embezzlement and money laundering of umrah costs. The approach method used in compiling the thesis is empirical legal research.Specifications in this studydescriptive analysis.The theories used include the theory of justice and the theory of the legal system. The results of this study are (1)Optimizing the recovery of victim losses in the case of embezzlement and money laundering of Umrah costs in the Abu Tours case, requires synergy between various legal instruments. The defendant HM and his colleagues were proven to have embezzled funds amounting to more than one trillion rupiah belonging to around 96,976 prospective Umrah pilgrims, which were diverted for personal interests and fictitious investments with the mode of offering cheap travel promos. The prosecutor's office charged the perpetrators with multiple charges based on Articles 372 and 378 of the Criminal Code and Articles 3 and 5 of the TPPU Law, and after the verdict had permanent legal force, the process of confiscation and handing over hundreds of assets to the curator to be auctioned and distributed to the victims.Referensi
Al-Qur’an:
QS. al-Baqarah ayat 196
Journals:
Abdul Aziz dan Ghufron Maksum. "Peluang Perempuan Menjadi Wali Nikah Di Indonesia." Al Ashriyyah Vol. 5. No.1, 2019,
Andi Maysarah, Mekanisme Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana, Jurnal Warta, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2019,
Dwiki Oktobrian et. al., "Proyeksi Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Merespon Asset Recovery Bagi Korban Penipuan Investasi. The Prosecutor Law Review Vol. 2, No. 2, 2024
Erdianto Effendi, Penjatuhan Pidana Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Pokok Dalam Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2022,
N. Utami, "Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan di Bidang Properti”." COMSERVA Indonesian Jurnal of Community Services and Development Vol. 2, No. 11, 2023,
Nurmalawaty, Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) dan Upaya Pencegahannya, Jurnal Equality, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2006,
Pandiangan, Florensia, and Berlian Simarmata. "Pemulihan Aset Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Berasal Dari Penipuan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 365 PK/Pid. Sus/2022)." Jurnal Profile Hukum, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2023,
Prakoso, Aji. "Kajian Viktimologi Dalam Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Pada Perusahaan Pembiayaan." Sivis Pacem Vol. 1, No. 1, 2023,
Ronald F C Sipayung et. al., “Analisis Yuridis Peran Polri Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Mata Uang Terkait Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang, 1998” USU Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2016,
Sarah N Welling, Smurfs, Money Laundering and The United States Criminal Federal Law, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol 22 No.3, 2003,
Siregar, Edward Fernando, Helvis Helvis, and Markoni Markoni. "Analisa Yuridis Eksekusi Sita Jaminan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU) First Travel." Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol. 2, No. 11, 2021,
Siswantari Pratiwi, Delik Penyertaan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), Binamulia Hukum, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2022,
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Serta Sistem Pengaturannya Dalam KUH Perdata, Ganec Swara, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2021,
Yuhendrilus, “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Disertai Pencurian Terhadap Anak di Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 06/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tlk),” Juhanperak Vol. 2, No. 3, 2021
Books:
Abdul Azis Dahlan, 2006, Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta,
Abdul Syukur Al-Azizi. 2015. Buku Lengkap Fiqh Wanita: Manual Ibadah Dan Muamalah Harian Muslimah Shalihah. DIVA press, Jakarta,
Abulkadir Muhammad, 1982, Hukum Perikatan, Alumni, Bandung,
Adami Chazawi, 2021, Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda, Media Nusa Creative, Malang,
Bambang Sunggono. 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Dedy sumardi, et. al., 2014, Hukum Pidana Islam, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh,
Delyana Sahnt, 2004, Konsep Penegakan Hukum, Liberty, Edisi Cetak Ulang, Yogyakarta,
J Remmelink, 2014, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Material 1: Prolegomena dan Uraian Tentang Teori Ajaran Dasar, Maharsa Publishing, Yogyakarta,
Kansil C.S.T. dan Christine S.T., 2000, Kamus Istilah Aneka Hukum, Pustaka sinar harapan, Jakarta,
Lawrence M. Friedman, 1975, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, Russel Sage Foundation, New York,
M. Quraish Shihab, 2002, Tafsir al-Mishbah, Lentera Hati, Jakarta,
M. Yahya Harahap, 1986, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Bandung,
M.Nurul Irfan, 2009, Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Fiqh Jinayah, cet ke-1, Badan Litbang dan Diklat Departemen Agama, Jakarta,
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Memahami Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta,
Muhammad Nazir, 1988, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta,
Muladi, 1997, Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang,
Purwahid Patrik, 1994, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan (Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian dan Dari Undang-Undang), Mandar Maju, Bandung,
Soerjono Soekanto, 2012, Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengekakan Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Yahya Harahap, 2019, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali (Edisi Kedua), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,
Yunus Husein, 2005, Negeri Sang Pencuci Uang, Pustaka Juanda Tiga lima, Jakarta,
Zakiah Daradjat, (et. al.), 1995, Ilmu Fiqih I, PT Dhana Bhakti Wakaf, Yogyakarta,
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Criminal Code;
Criminal Procedure Code;
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code;
Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes.
Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3276 K/PID.SUS/2019 Dated October 7, 2019 in the Cassation Level Case on Behalf of Defendant H. MUH. KASIM SUNUSI BIN SUNU DG. NOMPO
Makassar District Court Decision Number 1379/Pid.B/2018/PN.MKS Dated February 21, 2019 in the First Level Case on Behalf of Defendant NURSYAHRIAH MANSYUR Alias IBU RIA Binti MANSYUR MAULANA
Makassar High Court Decision Number 196/PID/2019/PT MKS
May 20, 2019 In the Appeal Case on Behalf of the Defendant NURSYAHRIAH MANSYUR alias IBU RIA Binti MANSYUR MAULANA
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3267 K/PID.SUS/2019
October 1, 2019 in the cassation case on behalf of the defendant NURSYAHRIAH MANSYUR alias IBU RIA Binti MANSYUR MAULANA
Makassar District Court Decision Number 1378/Pid.B/2018/PN.MKS Dated February 21, 2019 in the First Level Case on Behalf of Defendant CHAERUDIN ALIAS PAK HERU BIN M. LATANG
Makassar High Court Decision Number 195/ PID / 2019 / PT MKS Dated May 20, 2019 in the Appeal Case on Behalf of the Defendant CHAERUDIN ALIAS PAK HERU BIN M. LATANG
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3280 K/PID.SUS/2019
October 1, 2019 in the cassation case on behalf of the defendant CHAERUDIN ALIAS PAK HERU BIN M. LATANG
Makassar District Court Decision Number 284/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.MKS dated November 27, 2019 in the First Level Case on Behalf of the Defendant PT. AMANAH BERSAMA UMAT
Makassar High Court Decision Number 51/PID.SUS/2020/PT MKS dated April 22, 2020 in the Appeal Case on Behalf of the Defendant PT. AMANAH BERSAMA UMAT
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1577 K/Pid.Sus/2021 Dated June 15, 2021 in the Cassation Level Case on Behalf of the Defendant PT. AMANAH BERSAMA UMAT
Makassar Commercial Court Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/PN.Mks dated 20 September 2018
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law