Restorative Justice Policy by the Prosecutor's Office as the Effectiveness of Criminal Case Resolution

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.1001-1010

Kata Kunci:

Restorative Justice, Prosecutor, Criminal Case.

Abstrak

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the functional restorative justice of the Prosecutor's Office towards the resolution of criminal cases. In this writing, the author uses a normative legal method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice shows the existence of the Prosecutor's Office in handling criminal cases by prioritizing a sense of justice. This step can change the paradigm of society towards public prosecutors as law enforcement officers in resolving criminal cases to be more humane and not arrogant by prioritizing a sense of justice for all parties and restoring them to their original state. The Prosecutor's Office as the controller of the case process (Dominus Litis), has a central position in law enforcement, because only the Prosecutor's Office institution can determine whether a case can be submitted to the Court or not based on valid evidence according to the Criminal Procedure Law. In this case, the policy of the Prosecutor's regulation regarding restorative justice can realize legal effectiveness for the conditions of punishment in Indonesia.

Biografi Penulis

  • F. Rinawati, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
    Student

Referensi

Andi Hamzah, (1986), Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, dari Retribusi ke Reformasi, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

Kuat Puji Prayitno, (2012), Aplikasi Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Peradilan Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta

Andri Kristanto, (2022), Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, Lex Renaissance, 7 (1), Januari

Hanafi Arief and Ningrum Ambarsari, (2018), Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10 (2)

Lukas Permadi Orlando Beremanda, (2023). Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Di Kejaksaan Negeri Jambi, PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Law

Novi Mardihana Sari & I Nyoman Budiana. (2020), Limitatif Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8 (9)

Susana Andi Meyrina, (2017), Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia bagi Masyarakat Miskin atas Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan, Jurnal HAM, 8 (1)

Waloyo Zulfikar dan Ipah Ema Jumiati, (2017), Formulasi Kebijakan Pendirian Lembaga Peradilan Khusus Hubungan Industrial di Kabupaten Bekasi, Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8 (2)

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-12-19

Terbitan

Vol 3 No 4 (2024): December 2024

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
  3. The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law