The Urgency of Electronic Evidence Validation by Judges in Digital Forensic Examinations

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.861-870

Kata Kunci:

Electronic, Evidence, Digital, Forensics, Judge.

Abstrak

The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the judge's methods in carrying out digital forensic examinations in analyzing electronic evidence in court. In this writing the author uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. The use of computers as a medium to commit crimes has its own level of difficulty in proving it. Handling often requires forensics, which is an activity to carry out investigations and determine facts related to criminal incidents and other legal issues. Digital forensics is the application of computer science and technology for the purposes of legal evidence, which in this case is to prove high-tech crimes scientifically so that digital evidence can be obtained that can be used to ensnare the perpetrator of the crime. The material requirements for electronic evidence are regulated in Article 6, Article 15 and Article 16 of the ITE Law, which in essence, electronic information and documents must be able to guarantee their authenticity, integrity and availability. To ensure the fulfillment of the material requirements referred to in many cases, digital forensics is needed.

Biografi Penulis

  • Gatot Sarwadi, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
    student

Referensi

Dikdik M. Arif Mansyur, dan Elisatris Gultom, (2005), CYBER LAW Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung

Feri Sulianta, (2008), Komputer Forensik, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta

Supandi, (2019). Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Untuk Mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia, Semarang: Undip Press

Anton Susanto, Ira Alia Maerani, and Maryanto, (2020), Legal Enforcement by the Police against Child of Criminal Doer of a Traffic Accident Who Caused Death (Case Study in Traffic Accident of Police Traffic Unit of Cirebon City Police Juridiction), Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3 (1)

Asep Sunarsa, (2018), Attorney Role In Fighting Crimes Of Motorcycle Gang In Cirebon, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1. (2)

Dewi Asimah. (2020), To Overcome The Constraints of Proof in The Application of Electronic Evidence. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3 (2)

Handrizal, Handrizal, (2017), Analisis Perbandingan Toolkit Puran File Recovery, Glary Undelete Dan Recuva Data Recovery Untuk Digital Forensik. J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komputer Dan Informatika), 1 (1)

H. Muslihin Rais, (2017), Nilai Keadilan Putusan Hakim pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Al-Daylah, 6 (1)

Insan Pribadi, (2018), Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Lex Renaissance, 1 (3)

I Made Wiryana MSc, (2008), SAFFA-NG Sistem Aristektur Manajemen Kasus Forensik. Indonesian Journal of Legal and Forensic Sciences, 1 (1)

Ruci, Meiyanti, and Ismaniah. (2015), Perkembangan Digital Forensik. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah UBJ, 15 (2)

Santhos Wachjoe P, (2016), Penggunaan Informasi Elektronik Dan Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Persidangan, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5 (1)

Sri Praptini, Sri Kusriyah, and Aryani Witasari, (2019), Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1)

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-05-04

Terbitan

Vol 3 No 1 (2024): March 2024

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
  3. The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law