The Reformulation of Criminal Procedure Law against the Rights of Suspects and Defendants in the Perspective of the Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.1.4.%25pKata Kunci:
Criminal, Justice, Reformulation.Abstrak
The birth of the Criminal Procedure Code as a Masterpiece of Indonesian criminal procedure law has many limitations and cannot accommodate criminal law issues in society. The content of the KUHAP contains many inconsistencies, both unclear, ambiguous, and void norms. One of the inconsistencies in the formulation of the contents of the Criminal Procedure Code concerns the rights of suspects and defendants. The inconsistency of the contents concerning the rights of suspects and defendants is contrary to the principles of justice, protection of human dignity, order and legal certainty for the sake of the rule of law. The purpose of this study is to analyze, systematize and interpret various legal inconsistencies in the contents of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the rights of suspects and defendants. This research method uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory and legal system approach. The conclusion of this study is that there is an inconsistency in the formulation of norms in the material contained in the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the rights of suspects and defendants which indicates that the formulators of the Criminal Procedure Code do not understand the conception of rights correctly so that it violates the principles of fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law.Referensi
Constitution
Act No. 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation
Act No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Powers
Act No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code
Ahmad, Amrullah, 2016. Dimensions of Islamic Law in the National Legal System, Gema Insani Press, Jakarta;
Ansorie Sabuan, 1990, Criminal Procedure Code. Space, Bandung;
Backy Krisnayudha, 2016. Pancasila and Law: Relations and Transformation of Both in the Indonesian State Administration System, Kencana, Jakarta;
Fitria Anita, Socialization of Reform of Criminal Procedure Law Regarding the Multimedia-Based Investigation Process, Journal of Justice Magazine Volume 21 Number 2 (2021);
H. Enju Juanda, Legal Construction and Methods of Legal Interpretation, Galuh Scientific Journal of Institutions (online), Vol.4, No.2, (2016);
Halim, Hamzah and Kemal Redindo Syahrul Putera. 2009. Practical Ways to Compile & Design Regional Regulations, Kencana Publisher, Jakarta
Laurence R Horn, 2018. Contradiction, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter, Stanford;
Lysa Angrayni, 2014, Diktat Introduction to Law, Suska Press, Riau;
Muladi. 1995. Capita Selecta Criminal Justice System. Publishing Board of Diponegoro University, Semarang;
R. Sugiharto, 2012, Criminal Justice System in Indonesia and Overview of Criminal Justice Systems in Several Countries, Unissula Press, Semarang;
Romli Atmasasmita, 1996, Criminal Justice System Existentialism and Abolitionism Perspective, Cet.II, Bina Cipta, Bandung;
Sidik Sunaryo. 2004. Capita Selecta Criminal Justice System, Malang Muhammadiyah University, Malang;
Wasis Susetio. Disharmony of Laws and Regulations in the Agrarian Sector. Lex Journal Journal (3)10. (2013);
Zainal Asikin, 2012, Introduction to Law, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Cet.1, Jakarta;
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law