Implementation of Rehabilitation for Narcotics Addicts in Law Enforcement Based on Benefit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.3.3780-3795

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Narcotics, Narcotics Abuse, Rehabilitation, The National Narcotics Board (BNN).

Abstract

In an effort to address the problem of drug abuse, the government has enacted Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Basically, the sanctions regulated in the Narcotics Law adhere to a Double Track System, namely in the form of criminal sanctions and action sanctions. In its development, drug abuse or addiction no longer leads to criminal sanctions in prison, but ends up in a rehabilitation center, while before rehabilitation is carried out, every drug abuse or addict must undergo an assessment process by the Integrated Assessment Team. This study aims to analyze and determine the effectiveness of the implementation of rehabilitation for drug abusers and addicts from a law enforcement perspective, analyze the obstacles faced in the implementation of rehabilitation, and determine efforts that can be made to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation implementation based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The theory used in this study is Lawrence M. Friedman's theory of the legal system as its analytical tool. This study uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach, namely examining legal doctrines, academic perspectives, and legal theories relevant to law enforcement issues in rehabilitation programs. Based on research, Indonesia has a global prevalence of drug abuse, predominantly among students and educational institutions. This requires further strengthening of rehabilitation programs. According to data from the Indonesian National Narcotics Agency (BNN), thousands of individuals are suspected of being drug abusers and addicts. However, rehabilitation implementation still faces obstacles and challenges. Consequently, the rehabilitation process has not been optimal, given the high number of drug abusers and addicts in Indonesia. Therefore, Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics has not yet fully implemented rehabilitation programs at the national level.

Author Biography

  • Fris Arianda, Sultan Agung Islamic University
    Student

References

Journals:

Andri Winjaya Laksana, Tinjauan Hukum Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika dengan Sistem Rehabilitasi, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol.II No.1, 2015, hal.80

Azizah, Amirotul, dan Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. “Reformulasi Ketentuan Rehabilitasi Bagi Pecandu Narkotika dalam Dimensi Ius Constituendum.” Jurnal Yusthima, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2023, hal.60

Bambang Tri Bawono, Dwi Wahyono, Andri Winjaya, Implementation of Rehabilitation for Drug Abuses According to Law Number 35 Of 2009 Concerning Narcotics, Jurnal Hukum UNISSULA, Vol.38 No. 1, 2022, hal.05

BNN RI, Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Rehabilitasi Narkotika (Jakarta: BNN, 2021), hlm. 35.

Depri Liber Sonata “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum”, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung,Vol. 8, Nomor 1 Januari-Maret 2014. hal 24

Laksono, Sipto Dwi, Nandang Sambas, dan Hadi Purnomo. “Implementasi Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dalam Melakukan Tindakan Rehabilitasi Medis dan Rehabilitasi Sosial.” Iustitia Omnibus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 2.

Salafi, Syafara Alifia, dan Pudji Astuti. “Efektivitas Penerapan Pasal 103 Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika terhadap Rehabilitasi Penyalahgunaan Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo.” NOVUM: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2022, hal.02

Siti Hidayatun, Yeni Widowaty, Konsep Rehabilitasi Bagi Pengguna Narkotika yang Berkeadilan, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol.1 No. 2, 2020, hal.02

Supriyadin, Herman, dan Handrawan. “Formulasi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana tentang Rehabilitasi dalam Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.” Halu Oleo Legal Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2019, hal.85

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report (Vienna: UNODC, edisi terbaru).

Books:

Abdul Kadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Achmad Ali. (2005). Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia: Penyebab dan Solusinya. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Andi Hamzah. (1993). Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Andi Hamzah. (2014). Teori dan Sistem Pemidanaan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

AR. Sujono, dkk. (2011). Komentar dan Pembahasan Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Bagir Manan. (2007). Persepsi Masyarakat Mengenai Pengadilan dan Peradilan yang Baik. Jakarta: Varia Peradilan.

Bambang Sunggono. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Cet. 5). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Barda Nawawi Arief. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Barda Nawawi Arief. (2016). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru). Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Barda Nawawi Arief. (2018). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Budi Sulaksana. (2003). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Jakarta: Akademi Ilmu Pemasyarakatan.

Dowiko, Harold. (1999). Drugs and Drug Policy: The Control of Consciousness Alteration.

Eva Achjani Zulfa. (2011). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

F. Asya. (2009). Narkotika dan Psikotropika. Jakarta: Asa Mandiri.

Friedman, Lawrence M. (2011). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (Diterjemahkan oleh M. Kozim). Bandung: Nusamedia.

Friedman, Lawrence M. (2019). Sistem Hukum Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Sosial (“The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective”). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Hari Sasangka. (2003). Narkotika dan Psikotropika dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Herbert L. Packer. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. California: Stanford University Press.

Hikmahanto Juwono. (2006). Penegakan Hukum dalam Kajian Law and Development: Problem dan Fundamen bagi Solusi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Varia Peradilan.

Jeremy Bentham. (1907). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Johnny Ibrahim. (2018). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.

Mahmud Mulyadi. (2008). Criminal Policy: Pendekatan Integral Penal Policy dan Non-Penal Policy dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Kekerasan (Mengutip A. Ray Jeffery). Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.

Mardani. (2008). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja & B. Arief Sidharta. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Buku I. Bandung: Alumni.

Mukti Fajar ND & Yulianto Achmad. (2017). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Muladi. (2002). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rahmansyamsuddin. (2013). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Integritas Keilmuan. Makassar: Alauddin University Press.

Ramon Nofrial. (2017). Problematika Keadilan. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.

Roeslan Saleh. (1983). Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Cetakan Kedua). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Satjipto Rahardjo. (2020). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sidharta. (2010). Reformasi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara. Dalam Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial, Putusan Hakim: Antara Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, dan Kemanfaatan. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2001). Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suratman & Philips Dillah. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Cet. 3). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wahyudesna Nugroho. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Polisi (Skripsi/Tesis). Universitas Lampung.

Yesmil Anwar & Adang. (2008). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana: Reformasi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Regulation:

Indonesia. Joint Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, Chief of Police of the Republic of Indonesia, Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia on Handling of Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse into Rehabilitation Institutions, PERBER Number: 01/PB/MA.III/2014, Number 03 of 2014, Number 11 of 2014, Number 03 of 2014, Number PER-005/A/JA/03/2014, Number 01 of 2014, Number PERBER/01/III/2014/BNN, LN No. 465 of 2014.

Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Technical Instructions for the Implementation of Medical Rehabilitation for Addicts, Abusers, and Victims of Narcotics Abuse who are in Process or who have been Decided by the Court, PMKes Number 46 of 2012, LN No. 1156 of 2012.

National Narcotics Agency Regulation Number 24 of 2017.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesia. Narcotics Law, Law No. 35 of 2009. LN No. 143 Year 2009. TLN No. 5062.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18