Legal Review of the Implementation of Replacement Money Execution as Additional Punishment for Corruption Convicts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25pKeywords:
Corruption, Execution, Replacement.Abstract
Replacement money in corruption cases has received less attention to be discussed, because so far in handling corruption cases, it tends to prioritize punishment of perpetrators of corruption rather than returning state losses. Basically, the implementation of the execution of the payment of replacement money is not much different from the implementation of executions against people or executions against goods in criminal cases in general, the difference is that there is a time limit for the convict to pay the replacement money after the verdict has permanent legal force. The purpose of this research is toknowing and analyzing (1) legal policy in creating a criminal punishment system for corruption in Indonesia, (2) the legal substance of the mechanism for executing court decisions in the form of compensation for corruption convicts, (3) legal problems in implementing the execution of compensation as an additional punishment for corruption convicts. The approach method used in this study is normative juridical. The data source used is secondary data. Secondary data is data obtained from library research consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Efforts to block the account are made to make it easier if the defendant is proven to have committed a criminal act of corruption and the court issues a criminal verdict of payment of compensation, then the prosecutor is always the executor who finds it easier to carry out the execution of compensation. (3) The problem in carrying out asset confiscation is that more than twenty years after the Corruption Eradication Law came into effect, there is still no law on asset confiscation as a derivative of Article 18 paragraph 1 of the Corruption Eradication Law.References
Journals:
Achmad Mudjiono, Kabinet Burhanuddin Harahap Tahun 1955-1956, Avatara: E-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 5 (3) Oktober 2017
Agus Pranoto, Abadi B Darmo dan Iman Hidayat, Kajian Yuridis mengenai Perampasan Aset Korupsi dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menurut Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Legalitas, X (1) Juni 2018
Ali Maulida, dkk. Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Pidana Islam, Al Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 8 (1) Mei 2020
Anirut Chuasanga and Ong Argo Victoria, Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia Dan Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1), March 2019
Anita Zulfiani, dkk. Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebelum dan Sesudah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP, dalam Upaya Menurunkan Angka Korupsi Pada Sektor Swasta, Unes Law Review, 5 (4) Juni 2023
Febriani, Sintia, and Sahuri Lasmadi. Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Melalui Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1 (1) 2020
Ferry Agus Sianipar, Pengembalian Aset Korupsi dalam Bentuk Pensitaan yang Tidak Berkehendak Membayar Uang Pengganti, Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 5 (2) Desember 2018
Herman, Implementasi Good Governance Menuju Terwujudnya Negara Bebas KKN di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah: Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 4 (1) Juli 2015
Indri Astuti, Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, FIS: Forum Ilmu Sosial, 41 (2) 2014
Ismansyah, Penerapan dan Pelaksanaan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Demokrasi, VI (2), 2007
Josua Nainggolan, Atma Suganda & Agung Makbul, Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum: Legalitas, 15 (1) Januari 2021
Ketut Sedana Arta, Sistem Pemerintahan Demokrasi Liberal dan Tercapainya Pemilihan Umum I pada Tahun 1955 di Indonesia, Jurnal Widya Citra, 1 (2) September 2020
Kristian Imanuel Kussoy, Eksistensi Pidana Tambahan sebagai Upaya Jaksa untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Crimen, X (12) November 2021
Books:
Abdul Manan, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Putra Grafika, Jakarta. 2005
Abd al-Hamīd Ibrāhīm al-Majālī, Masqathath al-`Uqūbah at-Ta`zīriyyah, Riyād: Dār an-Nasyr, 1992
Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Bagian 1, Stelsel Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, PT Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2005
Fithriatus Shalihah, Buku Ajar Sosiologi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, 2015
G Peter Hofnagels, sebagaimana dikutip oleh Syafruddin, Pidana Ganti Rugi : Alternatif Pemidanaan Di Masa Depan Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Tertentu, 2002
Guse Prayudi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pandang dalam Berbagai Aspek, Pustaka Pena, Yogyakarta, 2010
Hamrat Hamid dan Harum Husein, Pembahasan Permasalahan KUHAP Bidang Penuntutan dan Eksekusi (dalam Bentuk Tanya Jawab), Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 1992
Leden Marpaung, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2007
Mahrus Ali, Asas, Teori & Praktek Hukum Pidana Korupsi, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2013
Maroni dan Nenny Dwi Ariani, Kebijakan Penanggulanga Kejahatan Korupsi di Indonesia, Aura: Anugrah Utama Raharja, Bandar Lampung, 2013
M.D.J.Al Barry, Kamus Peristilahaan Modern dan Populer 10.000 Istilah. Surabaya: Indah Surabaya, 1996
Monang Siahaan, Korupsi Penyakit Sosial yang Mematikan, PT.Gramedia, Jakarta. 2013
M. Rukmini, Aspek Pidana dan Kriminologi. Bandung: Alumni, 2010
Muhammad Abū Zahrah, al-Jarīmah wa al-`Uqūbah fī al-Fiqh alIslāmī: al-Jarīmah, Kairo: Dār al-Fikr al-`Arabī, 1998
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Semarang, Banda Penyediaan Bahan Kuliah, 1984
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung:
Supardi, Prampasan Harta Hasil Korupsi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta 2019
Surachmin & Suhandi Cahaya, Strategi & Teknik Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
