Police Efforts to Legitimize the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Judicial Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.551-560Keywords:
Police, Legitimacy, Restorative Justice.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the specifications of the Police's legal policy products in implementing the concept of restorative justice. In this writing, the author uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. In its implementation, the handling of criminal acts in Indonesia still uses a retributive justice system that is oriented towards retribution and prioritizes legal certainty. If the handling of criminal acts between extra ordinary crimes, ordinary crimes, and minor motives is not distinguished, especially criminal acts whose losses are possible to be recovered, of course it can sacrifice the sense of justice and social reaction to the victim. In this problem, the victim is not only the party who is harmed, but the suspect is also a victim of the criminal process which is essentially to provide justice for both parties. Therefore, an optimal alternative action is needed from the applicable regulations, namely in the form of discretionary actions at the stages of the criminal justice system, one of which is the Police institution.
References
Karim. (2019). Ius Constituendum (Pengaturan Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Restorative Justice). Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing
Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan, (2013), Hukum Acara Pidana, cetakan 1, Jakarta: Djambatan
Marian Liebmann, (2007), Restorative Justice, How it Work, London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Abbas Said, (2012), Tolak Ukur Penilaian Penggunaan Diskresi oleh Polisi dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 1 (1), Maret
Aziz Saputra, dkk. (2023), Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Guna Mewujudkan Kemanfaatan dan Keadilan Masyarakat, Jurnal Litbang Polri, 26 (3), Desember
Hariman Satria, (2018), Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana, Jurnal Media Hukum, 25 (1), Juni
Ilhamdi Putra dan Khairul Fahmi, (2021). Karakteristik Ne Bis In Idem dan Unsurnya dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, 18 (2), Juni
Marian Liebmann, (2007), Restorative Justice, How it Work, London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
N. K. Sutrisni, (2015). Pengaturan Advokasi terhadap Hak-Hak Penyandang Disabilitas terhadap Diskriminasi di Bidang Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Jurnal), 4 (1)
Yana Kusnadi Srijadi & Ari Wibowo, (2023). Peranan Kepolisian dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana melalui Mekanisme Restorative Justice, Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22 (2)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law