Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Justice Collaborators in Law Enforcement of Narcotics Crimes (Research Study of the Narcotics Directorate of the Riau Islands Regional Police)
Abstract
This research focuses on the juridical analysis of the implementation of Justice Collaborators in law enforcement for narcotics crimes during the investigation and inquiry stages at the Directorate of Narcotics Research, Riau Islands Regional Police. As an extraordinary transnational organized crime, narcotics distribution is managed through closed systems and the omerta (code of silence), making it difficult to uncover through conventional judicial mechanisms. This study employs normative and empirical juridical methods to examine the legal framework, ranging from Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 4 of 2011 to Law No. 31 of 2014, and its practical implementation. The results indicate that a Justice Collaborator holds a crucial dual role: as a legal subject accountable for their actions and as a strategic source of information to dismantle network structures, modus operandi, and the chain of command of major kingpins. The application of this concept at the Riau Islands Regional Police is often pragmatic and transactional, where the state provides rewards in the form of sentence reductions in exchange for significant information. However, its effectiveness is still hampered by a lack of uniform understanding among law enforcement officers and weak physical protection for cooperating offenders and their families. Theoretically, this study confirms that the testimony of a Justice Collaborator serves as corroborating evidence that acts as a ”road map" for investigators to construct a comprehensive case. Despite its strategic value, the validity of such testimony must still be tested against the principle of a minimum of two valid pieces of evidence to prevent abuse of power. As a recommendation, stronger and more specific regulations at the statutory level (particularly in the revision of the Narcotics Law and the Criminal Procedure Code/KUHAP) are required to ensure legal certainty regarding the criteria for identifying cooperating offenders and standardized protection for high-risk individuals to eradicate narcotics networks at their roots.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Achjani Zulfa, Eva. 2013. “Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Atmasasmita, Romli. 2012. “Kejahatan Terorganisir dan Tantangan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi.
Hamzah, Andi. 2015. “Perlindungan Saksi dan Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2014. “Pembuktian dalam Hukum Acara Pidana dan Peran Saksi.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan.
Mulyadi, Lilik. 2016. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Pemberantasan Kejahatan Terorganisir.” Jurnal Yuridika.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. 2010. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Perspektif Kriminologi.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia.
Samosir, Djisman. 2013. “Peran Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan.
Sunarso, Siswanto. 2011. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.
Prasetyo, Teguh. 2017. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum Pidana.
Books:
Andi Hamzah. 2014. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di Dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Andi Hamzah. 2016. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2016. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Chairul Huda. 2011. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Djisman Samosir. 2013. Segi-Segi Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Eva Achjani Zulfa. 2013. Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerja Sama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: FH UI Press.
Gatot Supramono. 2009. Hukum Narkoba Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Hari Sasangka. 2003. Narkotika dan Psikotropika dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Lilik Mulyadi. 2015. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Penanggulangan Organized Crime. Bandung: Alumni.
Mardjono Reksodiputro. 2007. Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
M. Yahya Harahap. 2012. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Regulation:
Republic of Indonesia. 1945. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Republic of Indonesia. 1981. Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).
Republic of Indonesia. 2009. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Republic of Indonesia. 2014. Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Change on Constitution Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
Republic of Indonesia. 2023. Regulation Government Number 25 of 2023 concerning Implementation Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
Court of the Republic of Indonesia. 2011. Circular Letter Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011 concerning Treatment for Reporter Action Criminal (Whistleblower) and Cooperating Witness (Justice Collaborator) in Case Certain Criminal Offenses.
Union Nations (United Nations). 2000. United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).
Union United Nations. 2003. United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.2.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: