The Role of The Police in Handling The Criminal Acts of Theft with Violence Based on The Provisions of Article 479 of The KUHP
Abstract
Indonesia, as a nation based on the rule of law, places the Indonesian National Police (Polri) as a key institution in law enforcement and public protection. One crime that requires serious attention is theft with violence, as stipulated in Article 479 of the Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), as it not only damages the victim's property but also threatens life and instills fear in the community. This study aims to analyze the role of the police in handling violent theft crimes. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results indicate that the police have a strategic role, spanning prevention, enforcement, and investigation as part of the criminal justice system. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, such as limited resources, difficulty proving elements of violence, and high public demand for expedited case handling. This study concludes that optimizing the role of the police needs to be done through increasing professionalism, strengthening coordination between law enforcement agencies, and implementing the principle of due process of law in order to realize effective law enforcement, protect victims, and ensure substantive justice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
――. (2019). “Penerapan Hukum Pidana Islam terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dan Pencurian.” 14(2).
――. (2020). “Analisis Pencurian dengan Kekerasan: Perspektif KUHP Baru.” 15(2).
――. (2020). “Peran Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan.”
――. (2020). “Peran Kepolisian dalam Penanganan Pencurian dengan Kekerasan: Perspektif Public Service Orientation.” 15(1).
――. (2021). “Due Process of Law dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dan Pencurian.” 16(1).
――. (2021). “Pemetaan Unsur Delik Pencurian dengan Kekerasan dalam KUHP Nasional.” 16(1).
――. (2021). “Pendekatan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.”
――. (2021). “Penerapan Unsur Delik Pencurian dengan Kekerasan dalam Praktik Peradilan.” 16(2).
――. (2022). “Aspek Psikologis Korban dalam Kasus Pencurian dengan Kekerasan dan Penanganannya.” 17(2).
――. (2022). “Interpretation Gap dalam Penegakan Pasal 479 KUHP.” 17(2).
――. (2022). “Pengawasan dan Akuntabilitas Aparat Penegak Hukum.”
――. (2022). “Restorative Justice dan Penanganan Pencurian dengan Kekerasan: Perspektif Humanis dan Kontekstual.” 17(1).
――. (2023). “Reformasi Kelembagaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.”
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah. (2018). “Relevansi Pidana Proporsional pada Kasus Curas/Begal.” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 17(3).
Books:
l-Shatibi, A. I. (tt). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharī‘ah (Juz II). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Arief, B. N. (2008). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2018). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Atmasasmita, R. (2011). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Audah, A. Q. (2017). Hukum pidana Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (2007). Al-fiqh al-islāmī wa adillatuhu (Jilid 6). Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Barda, N. A. (2008). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Beccaria, C. (1995). On crimes and punishments (R. Davies, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hadi, S. (2022). Peran kepolisian dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Semarang: UNISSULA Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Hamzah, A. (2014). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Lubis, A. (2019). Strategi penegakan hukum dan perlindungan masyarakat. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muladi, & Barda, N. A. (2012). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi. (1998). Teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2001). Rekonstruksi hukum pidana: Suatu tinjauan filsafat hukum. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sadhuwiguna, M. K., & Satyayudha, N. S. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis pencurian dengan kekerasan. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2).
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Model pembaruan hukum pidana berbasis nilai-nilai Pancasila. Semarang: UNISSULA Press.
Regulation:
――. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 30 paragraph (4).
――. (1981). Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
――. (2002). Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Republic of Indonesia National Police. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
――. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (National Criminal Code). Jakarta: State Secretariat.
Republic of Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.2.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
