The Authority of the Prosecutor in Investigations of Criminal Acts of Corruption as an Effort to Recover State Financial Losses Justice Based

Pratama Hendrawan Mahardika

Abstract


The research objectives in this study: 1) to study and analyze the authority of the prosecutor's office in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state financial losses; 2) to study and analyze the weaknesses of the prosecutor's authority in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state finances; 3) to study and analyze the authority of the prosecutor's office in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state financial losses based on justice. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with a descriptive analytical research method. The data used is secondary which will be analyzed with applicable regulations. Research problems are analyzed using the theory of authority, legal system theory and justice theory. The results of the study conclude that: 1) The authority of the prosecutor's office in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state financial losses, namely the authority of the Public Prosecutor in resolving the return of state financial losses is an attribution authority that comes directly from statutory regulations, especially the Corruption Law and statutory regulations regarding the Prosecutor's Office; 2) The weakness of the prosecutor's authority in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state finances, namely the process of returning state financial losses still has several weaknesses, especially in the stage of executing replacement money and the stage of tracking assets. Tracking and securing assets that have not been maximized since the initial stage of the investigation has an impact on the limited assets that can be executed; 3) The prosecutor's authority in investigating corruption crimes as an effort to return state financial losses based on justice, namely the implementation of returning state financial losses due to corruption crimes is carried out in several stages, namely: tracking, blocking, confiscation, confiscation, and returning state losses.


Keywords


Authority; Losses; Office; Prosecutor's; Restitution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

A Widodo, “Reformasi Struktur Kejaksaan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Khusus,” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum (2021): 4(2), 90–104.

Asiyah, Simanjuntak, dan Pohan, 2020, Pengembalian Keurgian Keuangan Negara dalam Pelaksanaan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Mercatoria, 13(2).

Badaru, B, 2023, Kepentingan Umum Dalam Asas Oportunitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1737-1754.

D Amalia, “Asset Recovery Dalam Penanganan Kasus Korupsi: Peran Strategis Kejaksaan,” Jurnal Integritas KPK (2022): 8(1), 12–25.

Edi Efendi dkk, 2023, Efektivitas Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi : Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Imu, Vol 1 No 6 E-ISSN : 2988-5760).

Hutapea, T., Koto, Z., & Syafruddin, S, 2024, Kebijakan Polri Dalam Upaya Mengefektifkan Penerapan Konsep Hukum Pidana Baru Dalam UU RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(1).

Kasim, R, 2020, Dehumanisasi pada penerapan hukum pidana secara berlebihan (overspanning van het straftrecht). Jambura Law Review, 2(1)

Koto, Z,2024, Rungkad Hakekat Penuntutan Dalam Penjelasan Pasal 132 Uu Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp Baru) Dan Kegalauan Penyidik/Penyidik Pembantu Polri. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(1).

M. K. Putri, “Restorative Justice Dan Prospeknya Dalam Kasus Korupsi Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum (2023): 15(2), 150–168.

R Sulaiman, “Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan (2020): 50(3), 331–349.

S Raharjo, “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Progresif (2022): 10(1), 45–59.

Sanusi, Lorent Pradini Imso, Pelaksanaan Tugas Fungsi dan Kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia dalam Hubungannya dengan Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004, Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ISSN: 2655-3449 (E) Volume 7 No. 1 | Mei 2019.

Siagian, F. S, 2023, Analisis Yuridis untuk Hak Pihak Ketiga yang Berkepentingan dalam Pengajuan Permohonan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Dalihan Na Tolu: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Komunikasi Indonesia, 1(02), 42-50.

Supriyanta, 2009, KUHAP Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Jurnal Wacana Hukum VIII No. 1

Books:

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2008

Dianti, F, 2024, Hukum Pembuktian Pidana di Indonesia: Perpandingan HIR dan KUHAP (Edisi Revisi). Sinar Grafika.Jakarta

Fadilah, O. N., Hamzani, A. I., & Widyastuti, T. V. (2023). Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Rusia. Penerbit NEM.

Laden Marpaung, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan) (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014), 191–192.

Mulyadi, D. L., & Sh, M. H, 2023, Bunga rampai hukum pidana umum dan khusus. Penerbit Alumni, Bandung.

Pangribuan, Luhut, 2014, Hukum Acara Pidana: Surat Resmi Advokat Di Pengadilan, Papasa sinar Sinanti, Jakarta.

Philipus M Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1987

Supriadi, Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Yesmil Anwar dan Adang, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Konsep, Komponen, dan Pelaksanaannya dalam Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia) (Bandung: Widya Padjajaran, 2011.

Regulation:

Pancasila

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Criminal Code

Criminal Procedure Code

Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Internet:

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/deretan-capaian-kinerja-kejagung-tahun-2025--pidsus-sumbang-pnbp-terbesar-lt69577eda953e6/ Accessed on May 5, 2026




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: