Implementation Of Mortgage Rights That Are Not Registered At The Land Office

Wartoyo Utomo, Latifah Hanim

Abstract


One of the collaterals that banks are interested in as credit collateral is mortgage rights. The existence of this mortgage right as regulated in Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights has characteristics that provide legal protection for creditors (banks). The objectives of this research are: 1). to know and analyze how the execution of mortgage rights that are not registered at the land office is carried out; 2). to know and analyze what are the obstacles and solutions to the execution of mortgage rights that are not registered at the land office; 3). to know and analyze what are the legal consequences that arise in the execution of mortgage rights that are not registered at the land office. This research uses a sociological-juridical approach, using a descriptive analytical research method. The data used are primary and secondary data, which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problem is analyzed using the theory of legal objectives, the theory of legal certainty, and Lawrence Friedman's theory. The results of the study concluded that: 1) The execution of mortgage rights that are not registered at the land office can still be carried out with the condition that there is a guarantee from a Notary in the form of a Covernote; 2). Obstacles to the execution of unregistered land rights guarantees are: the obstacles that occur mostly come from legal obstacles which include obstacles regarding the validity period of the SKMHT and obstacles regarding the completeness of the files by the applicant which causes the emergence of non-legal obstacles such as obstacles in paying taxes, obstacles in the case of the debtor dying when the mortgage encumbrance process has not been completed and obstacles in the lack of creditor knowledge about land rights registration. The solution is that it is better to make the SKMHT after the announcement process from the ATR-BPN Office in connection with the completion of the process indicating that the third party has no objections so that it can minimize problems so that the creation of land books and the issuance of certificates can be ensured that there are no obstacles; 3). The legal consequences of executing a mortgage right that is not registered cause the mortgage creditor to not have the position of a preferred creditor as a mortgage creditor but rather the same as the position of a concurrent creditor.


Keywords


Execution; Land Office; Mortgage Rights.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Anisa Kartika Sari, 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Di Kantor Pertanahan. Jurnal Repertorium. Edisi 3 Januari - Juni 2015. Surakarta, Program MKN.HK UNS

David Adrian. 2014, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Objek Hak Tanggungan Dari Upaya Sita Jaminan Oleh Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Lex Privatum, Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Books:

A. Abdurrachman, G.M Verryn Stuart, Drs.O.P. Simorangkir, 2014, Ensiklopedia Ekonomi Keuangan dan Perbankan Bank, Bank Politic, Indonesia, PT. Pradya Paramitya, Jakarta.

Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, 2006, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2012, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Pusat Bahasa (Edisi Keempat), PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Ediwarman, 2010, Monograf, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih, Anak Agung Istri Agung, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, 2021, Parate Eksekusi Fidusia Polemik Kepastian Hukum dan Bisnis, C.V. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Kasmir, 2014, Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan lainnya, PT RajaGrafindo, Jakarta.

M. Marwan dan Jimmy P, 2009, Kamus Hukum, Reality Publisher, Surabaya.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.

Muladi, 2002, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat, Alumni, Bandung.

Munir Fuady, 2002, Hukum Tentang Pembiayaan Konsumen, P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

__________, 2006, Hukum Perkreditan Kontemporer, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti,Jakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

R. Subekti, 2009 , Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata[Burgerlijk Wetboek ], Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Rachmadi Usman, 2010, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Sinar Grafik, Jakarta.

Rahman, H, 1998, Aspek–Aspek Hukum Pemberian Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia, citra Aditya Bakti, Jakarta.

Samosir, Djisman, 2002, Fungsi Pidana Penjara Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Bina Cipta, Bandung.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2003, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Surayin, 2005, Analisis Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Yrama Widya, Bandung.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 1993, Kebebasan Berkontrak Dan Perlindungan Yang Seimbang Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Di Indonesia, Institut Bankir Indonesia, Jakarta.

Regulation:

Civil Code (KUHPerdata)

Government Regulation Number 86 of 2000 concerning Procedures for Registering Fiduciary Guarantees and Costs for Making Fiduciary Guarantee Deeds

Law no. 4 of 1996concerning Mortgage Rights over Land and Objects Related to Land.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.1.625-642

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: