Legal Certainty In The Use Of Presidential Instructions As A Basis For State Budget Efficiency

Achmad Hafisz Tohir, Andri Winjaya Laksana

Abstract


The management of the State Budget (APBN) is a manifestation of the people's sovereignty in the fiscal sector, which must be implemented based on the principles of the rule of law, legal certainty, and fiscal democracy. The state spending efficiency policy implemented through a Presidential Instruction has sparked constitutional debate because it impacts the budget structure without going through legislative mechanisms. This situation raises questions about the urgency of the budget efficiency policy and its compliance with the principle of legal certainty and the hierarchy of laws and regulations in the Indonesian state financial system. This study aims to analyze the urgency of issuing the budget efficiency policy and assess its compliance with the principle of legal certainty and the structure of legal norms in the Indonesian state system. This research employs normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The statutory approach is used to analyze constitutional provisions, state financial laws, and regulations related to state budget management. The conceptual approach is used to examine the theory of legal certainty, the hierarchy of norms, government authority, and fiscal democracy. Meanwhile, the comparative approach is used to compare budget management practices within constitutional systems in democratic countries to strengthen the normative analysis. The research findings indicate that budget efficiency policies are urgently needed in the context of fiscal pressures and the need to maintain the sustainability of state finances. However, the use of administrative instruments to make substantive changes to the budget structure conflicts with the principles of legal certainty and the hierarchy of legal norms, as administrative norms lack the authority to amend laws. This practice also has the potential to undermine the principles of fiscal democracy, disrupt checks and balances, and have systemic implications for the integrity of the rule of law. Therefore, budget efficiency policies must remain implemented within the constitutional framework and through legitimate legislative mechanisms to ensure legal certainty, fiscal accountability, and the protection of citizens' constitutional rights.


Keywords


Executive Authority; Fiscal Democracy; Hierarchy Of Norms; Legal Certainty; State Finances.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Djafar, W. (2010). Menegaskan kembali komitmen negara hukum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 151–174.

Katili, M. F. B., et al. (2025). Reformasi politik dan kewenangan presiden. Politika Progresif, 2(2), 373–383.

Rizqiyyah, R. N., et al. (2023). Mekanisme checks and balances system. Proceedings of Islamic Economics, Business, and Philanthropy, 2(1), 86–98.

Romdoni, M., et al. (2023). Justice, certainty and usefulness in law enforcement. Journal of Law Science, 5(4).

Books:

Abimanyu, D. A. (2013). Refleksi dan gagasan kebijakan fiskal. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ali, Achmad. (2010). Menguak teori hukum (Legal theory) dan teori peradilan (Judicial prudence). Kencana.

Ali, Achmad. (2015). Menguak teori hukum & teori peradilan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ávila, H. (2016). Legal certainty in law. Springer.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2010). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly., et al. (2021). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Bentham, Jeremy. (2016). Teori perundang-undangan. Nuansa.

Dicey, A. V. (1959). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Macmillan.

Fisher, L. (2014). The power of the purse. University Press of Kansas.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Fuller, Lon L. (1964). The morality of law. Yale University Press.

Hamidi, Jazim. (2013). Membedah teori-teori hukum kontemporer. UB Press.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (1994). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (1997). Tentang wewenang. Yuridika.

Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.

Huda, Ni’matul. (2014). Hukum tata negara Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Hutchinson, T. (2002). Researching and writing in law. National Library of Australia.

Indrati Soeprapto, Maria Farida. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan. Kanisius.

Kelsen, Hans. (1945). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.

Kelsen, Hans. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.

Regulation:

Constitution of Japan (1947).

Constitution of the United States (1787).

Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 013-022/PUU-IV/2006 concerning the Judicial Review of Law No. 17 of 2003 against the 1945 Constitution (if used in the discussion).

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1949).

Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislation (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2011 Number 82, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5234) as last amended by Law Number 13 of 2022.

Law Number 15 of 2004 concerning Audit of State Financial Management and Accountability (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2004 Number 66, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4400).

Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2003 Number 47, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4286).

Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation becomes Law

Law Number 62 of 2024 concerning the Law on the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN) for the 2025 Fiscal Year.

Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2025 concerning Control of Central Government Expenditure for the 2025 Fiscal Year.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.1.213-230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: