Searches According To Criminal Procedure Law From A Human Rights Perspective
Abstract
This research examines the practice of searches in criminal procedural law from a human rights perspective. Searches are coercive actions that can affect an individual's privacy and freedom; Thus, they must be conducted following human rights principles. This study highlights the importance of balancing law enforcement interests with the protection of individual rights during search procedures. The research employs a normative method with a legislative approach and case analysis to evaluate the compliance of search practices with applicable human rights standards. The results indicate that although Indonesian criminal procedural law has regulated search mechanisms, there are challenges in its implementation that may violate human rights, such as breaches of privacy rights and procedures not meeting standards. Some cases show searches conducted without authorization or exceeding authority, leading to violations of individual rights. Therefore, reforms and increased oversight of search procedures are necessary to ensure that human rights are respected. This research suggests the need for clearer regulatory reinforcement and strict supervision of search practices in criminal procedural law. Moreover, enhancing law enforcement officers' training and awareness of the importance of human rights in every enforcement action is crucial. With these measures, it is hoped that searches can be conducted effectively and fairly without compromising the protection of individual rights.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Budiono, Herlien, Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang kenotariatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakri, 2009.
Fakultas Hukum Nasional Gajah Mada, Keputusan Seminar Hukum Jaminan Departemen Kehakiman. Yogjakarta, tgl. 9-11 Oktober 1987.
Harahap, M Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan Persidangan,Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cetakan Ke-4. Jakarta: SinarGrafika, 2006. Ibrahim, Johnny, Teori Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Kementerian Agama RI, Al-Qur’an Terjemahan. Jawa Barat: Dipenogoro, 2008 Marilang, Hukum Perikatan Makassar. Alauddin University Press, 2013.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogjakarta: Liberty, 1985 Miru, Ahmadi, Sakka Pati, Hukum Perikata: Penjelasan Makna Pasal 1223 sampai 1456 BW. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009.
Muljadi, Kartini, dkk, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjajian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Natadimija, Harumita, Mengenai Hukum Perorangan Dan Hukum Benda. Yogjakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2009.
Nawawi, Hadari, Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogjakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 1993.
Patrik, Purwahid, Hukum Perdata Jili I. Bandung: Alfabeta,1998.
Racmadi, Usman, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Rianto, Adi, Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial Dan Hukum. (Jakarta: Granit, 2010.
Salim, HS, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia.Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafika Persada, 2004
Shananova, Hukum Dalam Ekonomi. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo, 2012. Subekti & R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT.Pradnya Paramita, Cetakan Ketigapuluhenam, 2005.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.5.1.81-89
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: