Analysis of the Enforcement of Dishonorable Discharge of Police Members Who Violate the Code of Ethics, as Seen in Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022
Abstract
As a nation governed by law, the Indonesian National Police (Polri) holds the fundamental duty of maintaining security, public order, and enforcing the law. However, the high number of behavioral deviations, such as the involvement of individual officers in serious criminal acts (for example, assault resulting in death, as in the case within the jurisdiction of the Central Java Regional Police), marks a dark chapter that damages the institution's image and credibility in the public eye. This condition necessitates the application of the severest sanction, the Dishonorable Discharge (PTDH), as a mechanism for accountability. This study aims to analyze: 1) the mechanism for enforcing PTDH against Polri members who violate the code of ethics in accordance with Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022 (Perpol 7/2022); 2) the factors contributing to the occurrence of PTDH; and 3) the impact of PTDH sanction implementation on the image and public trust in the Polri institution. This research employs a normative juridical method (normative legal research), with a statute approach and a case approach. The research type is descriptive analytical, comprehensively examining prevailing laws and regulations (including Law No. 2 of 2002, Government Regulation No. 1 of 2003, and Perpol No. 7 of 2022) and their enforcement practices, with a case study in the jurisdiction of the Central Java Regional Police. The theoretical framework utilized includes the Theory of Legal Certainty, the Theory of Professional Ethics, and the Theory of Law Enforcement. The research findings indicate that the PTDH mechanism is strictly enforced, particularly for severe categories of the Polri Professional Code of Ethics (KEPP) violations, as defined in Article 17 paragraph (3) of Perpol 7/2022. The fundamental factors contributing to violations leading to PTDH are the abuse of power, the failure to internalize ethics and professionalism, and a "shortcut" mentality involving violence. Strict PTDH enforcement serves as a crucial self-cleansing mechanism. This highest sanction functions as a vital tool for accountability, image restoration, and deterrent effect. The consistent, fair, and transparent application of PTDH is tangible evidence of Polri's commitment to upholding integrity, legal certainty, and professionalism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Qur’an:
Q.s An-Nahl ayat 90
Q.s Shad ayat 26
Q.s Yusuf ayat 76
Journals:
Dewangga, W. J. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dengan Pelaku Anggota Kepolisian (Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Hukum Boyolali). Jurnal Jurisprudence, 4(2), 65-74.
ERLIATI, N. F. N. (2011). Analisis Yuridis Sosiologis Implementasi Kode Etik Profesi Polri (Studi Di Kepolisian Resor Malang Kota) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).
Nursanthy, A. T. R., Ratnasari, D., & Romsahadi, T. (2022). Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat (PTDH) Anggota Polri Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Perkap No. 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 5(2), 77-89
Rahayu, C. K., & Nurcahyono, A. (2023, January). Penegakan Kode Etik Polri Terhadap Anggota yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 893/Pid. Sus/2019/PN. Bdg). In Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 288-295).
Rajalahu, Y. (2013). Penyelesaian pelanggaran kode etik profesi oleh Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 2(2).
Widya Yuridika, Penegakan Hukum Peraturan Kedinasan Kepolisian dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Etika Kepolisian, Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, (Juni 2021)
Books:
Awaloedin Djamin, 1995, Administrasi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia: Kenyataan dan Harapan, POLRI, Bandung.
Asep Saepul Hamdi dan E.Bahruddin, 2014, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Deepublish..
Bambang Sunggono,2001, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Cet. III, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2007, Masalah Penegekan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Edisi 1, Jakarta.
Bisri Ilham, 1998, Sisten Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Grafindo Persada
Creswell, John W., 2007, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five. Apporoaches. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Ishaq, 2018, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
J.R. Raco, 2013, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Jenis, Karakter dan Keunggulannya, Jakarta :Grasindo
Ketut Astawa, 2016, Etika Profesi Polri Jakarta : STIK-PTIK
Lili Rasjidi dan Ira Thania Rasjidi, 2010, Pengantar Filsafat Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Momo Kelana, 1972, Hukum Kepolisian, Perkembangan di Indonesia Suatu studi Histories Komperatif, Jakarta: PTIK.
R. Abdussalam, 2006,Prospek Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dalam Mewujudkan Rasa Keadilan Masyarakat, Jakarta: Restu Agung
Rena Yulia, 2010, Viktimologi (Perlindungan Terhadap Korban Kejahatan), Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Sadjijono, 2008, Hukum Kepolisian (Polri dan Good Governance), Surabaya: Laksbang Mediatama
Satjipto Raharjo,2000, Hukum dan Masyarakat, Cetakan Terakhir,Bandung: Angkasa
Regulation:
Constitution
Criminal Code
Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Republic of Indonesia National Police
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP)
Government Regulation Number 1 of 2003 concerning Dismissal of Members of the Republic of Indonesia National Police
Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022 Code of Professional Ethics and Commission of the Code of Ethics of the Republic of Indonesia National Police.
Court ruling:
Purwokerto District Court Decision Number 205/Pid.B/2023/PN Pwt
Semarang High Court Appeal Decision Number 134/PID/2024/PT SMG
Supreme Court Judicial Review Decision Number 207 PK/Pid/2025
Excerpt from the Decision of the Indonesian National Police Code of Ethics Commission (KKEP) of the Banyumas Police Number PUT/16/IX/2024/KEPP, PUT/17/IX/2024/KEPP, PUT/18/IX/2024/KEPP
Excerpts of the Appeal Decision of the Banyumas Police KKEP Number PUT APPEAL/6/V/Kom Appeal, PUT APPEAL/7/V/Kom Appeal, PUT APPEAL/8/V/Kom Appeal
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.5590-5603
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: