Legal Analysis of Criminal Conspiracy in Class I Narcotics Crimes Not Plants and the Imposition of Criminal Sentences by Judges Study of Decision Number 23/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Ban
Abstract
This research is entitled "Juridical Analysis of Criminal Conspiracy in Class I Non-Plant Narcotics Crimes and the Imposition of Criminal Sentences by Judges: Case Study of Decision Number 23/ Pid.Sus/2025/PN Bantaeng." This research uses a normative legal research method, which focuses on applicable positive legal norms. The primary focus of normative legal research is analyzing relevant laws, doctrines, and court decisions to identify principles, rules, and legal constructions that can address the issues under study. Criminal conspiracy in the crime of class I narcotics, not plants, according to positive Indonesian law is regulated in Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Criminal conspiracy is seen as a stand-alone crime, so that even though the narcotics crime has not been carried out, an agreement between two or more people to carry out illegal narcotics trafficking is sufficient to ensnare the perpetrator with criminal sanctions.
Keywords
References
Journals:
Hafidz, J. (2020). Rekonstruksi pemidanaan dalam perspektif hukum Islam dan keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 8(2), 221–236.
Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010). What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs? British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq038
Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010). What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs? British Journal of Criminology, 50(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq038
Leni, Y. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana penganiayaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 48(2), 231–245.
Nugroho, B. W. (2020). Digital evidence dan tantangan pembuktiannya dalam proses peradilan pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(3), 509–528.
Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
Sjahran, A. R. (2016). Konsep permufakatan jahat dalam tindak pidana narkotika: Studi komparatif KUHP dan UU Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 46(1), 25–45.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Keadilan restoratif dalam penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 15(3), 247–260.
Wismantoro, E. (2021). Pendekatan restoratif dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Hukum dan pembangunan, 51(3), 321–337.
Books:
Andi Hamzah. (2001). Teori-teori pemidanaan dan penerapannya dalam praktek. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Andi Hamzah. (2005). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ashworth, A. (2010). Sentencing and criminal justice (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. (1832). The province of jurisprudence determined. London: John Murray.
Beccaria, C. (1986). On crimes and punishments (D. Young, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1764)
Bentham, J. (1948). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Hafner Publishing Company.
Bentham, J. (1970). Of laws in general (H. L. A. Hart, Ed.). University of London: Athlone Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
Cotterrell, R. (2003). The politics of jurisprudence: A critical introduction to legal philosophy. LexisNexis.
Gustav Radbruch. (1950). Legal philosophy (K. Wilk, Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kurniawan, A. (2021). Reformasi sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Lubis, M. (2017). Pengantar hukum pidana. Medan: USU Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Moeljatno. (2007). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1992). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Rani, Y., Ardha, B., & Marlina, L. (2022). Kriminologi dan perkembangan kejahatan modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Robinson, P. H. (2008). Structure and function in criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sudarto. (1986). Hukum dan hukum pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). Prinsip-prinsip dasar dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2021). Pemidanaan dalam perspektif religius dan HAM. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Hafidz, J. (2021). Model sistem pemidanaan humanis dalam penegakan hukum narkotika. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
Regulation:
Republic of Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Republic of Indonesia. (1981). Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1981 Number 76.
Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2009 Number 143.
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2020 concerning Electronic Evidence.
Supreme Court Circular Letters Number 4 of 2010, Number 3 of 2015, Number 1 of 2017, and Number 3 of 2023.
Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Article 132 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 114 paragraph (1).
Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Article 183.
Internet:
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana. Diakses dari kutipan skripsi Anda.
Gustav Radbruch. (1950). Legal Philosophy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Dikutip dalam terjemahan Kurt Wilk, hlm. 15.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
