The Ideal Concept of Asset Recovery in Corruption Criminal Acts Based on Progressive Law

Robbyansyah Hutasoit, Arpangi Arpangi

Abstract


Indonesia, as a state based on the rule of law based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, faces serious challenges in eradicating corruption, which has become a systemic crime. Law enforcement is still oriented towards a retributive approach, resulting in a less than ideal return of state assets (asset recovery). A progressive and restorative reconstruction of law enforcement based on the principles of the UNCAC is needed, with a focus on recovering state losses through inter-institutional synergy, strengthening legal instruments, and public participation to achieve justice and social welfare. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of asset recovery in corruption crimes in Indonesia and to analyze the ideal concept of asset recovery in corruption crimes based on progressive legal principles. The method used in compiling this thesis is normative legal research. The specifics of this research are descriptive analysis. The theories used include the theory of the purpose of punishment and progressive legal theory. The results of this study are: (1) The implementation of asset recovery in corruption crimes in Indonesia shows that although regulations such as the Corruption Eradication Law, the Money Laundering Law, and the UNCAC are complete, they still focus on criminal penalties rather than recovering state losses. Legal instruments such as additional penalties and asset confidentiality have not been implemented optimally due to lengthy legal processes and high evidentiary standards. Many court decisions only impose prison sentences without maximum asset recovery, such as in the e-KTP case and the Harvey Moeis tin corruption case. The legal system needs to shift to a restorative paradigm that places the empowerment of corruptors as the primary instrument for restoring state finances and strengthening public trust in the law. (2) The ideal concept of asset recovery based on progressive law places asset recovery as the primary objective of criminal punishment by making the state actively reclaim corrupted public assets for the sake of social welfare. The Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) mechanism is a breakthrough instrument that allows for the confiscation of assets without waiting for the perpetrator's conviction through an in rem lawsuit with more flexible yet accountable standards of evidence. Practices in the Philippines demonstrate the effectiveness of NCB in pursuing cross-border assets and protecting third parties in good faith, serving as an important model for Indonesia. This approach aligns with the principles of progressive law because it is adaptive, supports social justice, and overcomes formal legal limitations to impoverish corruptors and restore public trust.


Keywords


Asset; Corruption; Law; Progressive; Recovery.

References


Journals:

Abdul Fatah et al., Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016

Bhilla Aliffitria dan Nuriyeni Kartika Bintarsari, Pengaruh Implementasi United Nations Convention Against Corruption Terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi di Australia Tahun 2013-2017, Insignia: Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2019

Bintang Mandala Karyudi dan Nuril Firdausiah, Implementasi Supremasi Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Lex Et Lustitia, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2024

BPPK Jurnal, Kendala Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Transnasional, Jurnal BPPK: Badan Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Keuangan, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2018

Cleopatra Nataly Kakomba, Tinjauan Hukum Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pada Pengadaan E-KTP Sebagai Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 130/Pid. Sus/TPK/2017/PN. JKT. PST), LEX PRIVATUM, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2025

Dwi Atmoko dan Amalia Syauket, Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Dampak Serta Upaya Pemberantasan, Binamulia Hukum, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2022

Erwin Ogi, Penerapan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Implikasi Yuridisnyaterhadap Praktik Peradilan, Lex et Societatis, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015

Firman Firdausi dan Asih Widi Lestari, Eksistensi ‘White Collar Crime’Di Indonesia: Kajian Kriminologi Menemukan Upaya Preventif, Reformasi, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016

Ifrani Ifrani, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Al-Adl, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2018

Jeremy Alexander Sine et al., Penerapan Pidana Tambahan Berupa Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Mantan Bupati Kabupaten Kupang Ibrahim Agustinus Medah (Putusan No. 78/Pid. Sus-TPK/2021/PN. KPG), Artemis Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2025

Kiki Kristanto et al., Karakteristik Gugatan Perdata dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Palangka Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2021

Komang Ayu Henny Achjar et al., Metode penelitian kualitatif: panduan praktis untuk analisis data kualitatif dan studi kasus, Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, Jambi, 2023

Lidya Agustin et al., Mekanisme Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2024

Lola Yustrisia, Mekanisme Pengembalian Aset Di Negara Wilayah Asia Tenggara, Sumbang12 Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2022

Miftakhul Khobid dan Gunarto, Analisa Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2018

Nawa Angkasa, Analisis Kedudukan dan Fungsi Yudikatif Sebagai Pemegang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Sistem Negara Hukum di Indonesia, Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013

Nurul Qomariyah, Praktik Sosial Budaya Pada Berita Daring Kasus Korupsi Oknum Pt Timah, Suami Sandra Dewi, Demagogi: Journal of Social Sciences, Economics and Education, Vol 2, No. 4, 2024

Refki Saputra, Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia, Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017

Rida Ista Sitepu dan Yusona Piadi, Implementasi Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Vol. 1, hlm. 1, 2019

Ridwan Arifin et al., Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi Yang Berada di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia, IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2017

Roby Satya Nugraha, Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Pasal 2 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Korupsi Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Menteri Juliari Batubara), PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2020

Tri Indah Sakinah dan Benny Sumardiana, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Policy Concept Through in Rem Lawsuit Based on Economic Analysis of Law, Reformasi Hukum, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2025

Yessy Artha Mariyanawati dan Moh Saleh, Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Perspektif, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2023

Yopi Gunawan dan Kristian Kris, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pascaratifikasi the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Positum, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018

Yuli Purwanti et al., Memiskinkan Koruptor Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Dan Politik Hukum Indonesia, JURIST: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Politik, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2025

Zulkarnain Pantoli, Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset (Strategi Baru Melawan Korupsi Dengan Pendekatan in REM), Journal of Human and Education (JAHE), Vol. 4, No. 6, 2024

Books:

Ade Mahmud, 2021, Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pendekatan hukum progresif. Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara), Jakarta

Asti Dwiyanti et al., 2024, Pengantar Hukum Pidana: Teori, Prinsip, Dan Implementasi, Green Pustaka Indonesia, Yogyakarta

Divisi Hukum dan Monitoring Peradilan, 2024, Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Korupsi Tahun 2023, Indonesia Corruption Watch

Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2016, Modul Pendidikan Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi, Pusat Pendidikan Pancasila dan Konstitusi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta

Nanda Dwi Rizkia dan Hardi Fardiansyah, 2023, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris), Penerbit Widina, Bandung

Nur Solikin, 2021, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Qiara Media, Pasuruan

Wisnu Murtopo Nur Muhamad et al., Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Penerbit Adab, Indramayu, 2023.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: