Enforcement of Criminal Law for Drug Addicts with a Restorative Justice Approach

Reni Savira Utami, Jawade Hafidz

Abstract


The research objectives in this study: 1). to study and analyze the enforcement of criminal law on drug abuse with a restorative justice approach; 2). to study and analyze the obstacles to the enforcement of criminal law on drug abuse with a restorative justice approach. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with a descriptive analytical research method. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problems are analyzed using Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory and restorative justice theory. The results of the study conclude that: 1) Criminal Law Enforcement on Drug Abuse with a Restorative Justice Approach is carried out through rehabilitation, mediation, customary institutions, consudication, coordination, consultation, counseling guidance, deversion. The process of implementing restorative justice according to Perja No. 18 of 2021 is carried out by an Integrated Assessment team consisting of 3 agencies, namely the Prosecutor's Office, the Police, and the National Narcotics Agency. Regarding the financing of the entire process, it is covered by the state budget (APBN), but for other additional costs required for drug addicts in undergoing rehabilitation, it can be obtained by the family or others provided that it does not conflict with the law; 2). The implementation of Restorative Justice in handling drug abuse cases in Indonesia faces various complex obstacles. Although Restorative Justice offers peaceful conflict resolution outside the court and is supported as a form of moral justice, its implementation in Indonesia is not optimal because there is no legal unification that regulates it systematically in the form of legislation. Law enforcement officers are often hesitant to offer Restorative Justice for fear of being misunderstood, especially in narcotics cases. Other obstacles include the lack of competence of law enforcement officers, inadequate rehabilitation facilities, and the lack of courage of abusers or addicts to report themselves for rehabilitation even though there are privileges they will get. The solution to the obstacles experienced in restorative justice is to improve the competence of law enforcement officers, improve inadequate rehabilitation facilities, provide socialization to the community about restorative justice for drug abusers.

The research objectives in this study: 1). to study and analyze the enforcement of criminal law on drug abuse with a restorative justice approach; 2). to study and analyze the obstacles to the enforcement of criminal law on drug abuse with a restorative justice approach. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with a descriptive analytical research method. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problems are analyzed using Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory and restorative justice theory. The results of the study conclude that: 1) Criminal Law Enforcement on Drug Abuse with a Restorative Justice Approach is carried out through rehabilitation, mediation, customary institutions, consudication, coordination, consultation, counseling guidance, deversion. The process of implementing restorative justice according to Perja No. 18 of 2021 is carried out by an Integrated Assessment team consisting of 3 agencies, namely the Prosecutor's Office, the Police, and the National Narcotics Agency. Regarding the financing of the entire process, it is covered by the state budget (APBN), but for other additional costs required for drug addicts in undergoing rehabilitation, it can be obtained by the family or others provided that it does not conflict with the law; 2). The implementation of Restorative Justice in handling drug abuse cases in Indonesia faces various complex obstacles. Although Restorative Justice offers peaceful conflict resolution outside the court and is supported as a form of moral justice, its implementation in Indonesia is not optimal because there is no legal unification that regulates it systematically in the form of legislation. Law enforcement officers are often hesitant to offer Restorative Justice for fear of being misunderstood, especially in narcotics cases. Other obstacles include the lack of competence of law enforcement officers, inadequate rehabilitation facilities, and the lack of courage of abusers or addicts to report themselves for rehabilitation even though there are privileges they will get. The solution to the obstacles experienced in restorative justice is to improve the competence of law enforcement officers, improve inadequate rehabilitation facilities, provide socialization to the community about restorative justice for drug abusers.

Keywords


Enforcement; Justice; Law; Restorative.

References


Journals:

Sinaga, H.S.R., “Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Narkotika di Indonesia”, Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol. 2, No. 7 (2021)

Yulianto, Taufiq, “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana”, ORBITH, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2023)

Affan, Ibnu dan Gema R., “Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Berbasis Hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2024)

Gilang Fajar Shadiq. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika New Psychoactive Subtances Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika”. Wawasan Yuridika 1, no 1 (2017) :35-53

Haposan Sahala Raja Sinaga. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Narkotika Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no 7 (2021): 528-541

Pamungkas, C.W.A, “Penerapan Restoratif Justice Pada Korban Penyalahguna Narkoba di Wilayah Hukum Polda Sumatera Utara (Studi di Direktorat Reserse Polda Sumatera Utara”, Tesis. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (2023)

Books:

Abintoro Prakorso, 2013, Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana, Laksbang Grafika, Yogyakarta

Siswanto Sunarso,2014, Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Dani Krinawati & Niken Subekti Budi Utami, 2014, Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Bagi Pecandu Narkotika Pada Tahap Penyidikan Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Bersama 7 (Tujuh) Lembaga Negara Republik Indonesia, Hasil Penelitian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Adami Chazawi, 2007, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1, PT Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Regulation:

Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.

Law Number 5 of 1997 concerning psychotropics.

Pancasila.

Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency No. 11 of 2014 concerning Procedures for Handling Suspects and/or Defendants of Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Rehabilitation Institutions

SEMA No. 4 of 2010 concerning the Placement of Drug Abusers, Victims of Drug Abuse and Drug Addicts in Medical Rehabilitation and Social Rehabilitation Institutions.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: