Integration of Pancasila Values in Criminal Law Reform: A Contextual Approach

Isti Muryani, Ira Alia MaeranI

Abstract


The reform of Indonesia's criminal law must be deeply rooted in the nation's foundational values, namely Pancasila. Historically, the national penal system has been largely influenced by legal positivism, emphasizing formal legal certainty while neglecting substantive justice and culturally embedded values within Indonesian society. This study highlights the urgency of integrating Pancasila's principles into criminal law reform, promoting a system that is not only repressive but also just and contextually relevant. Using a juridical-normative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, this research explores the alignment between criminal law reform and Pancasila as the highest legal value source in Indonesia. The findings suggest that core consensus principles such as just and civilized humanity, social justice, and deliberative resonate strongly with the ideals of restorative justice and rehabilitative approaches that are increasingly prominent in the modern criminal justice discourse. Nonetheless, the primary challenge lies in operationalizing these values into concrete, enforceable legal norms. Therefore, integrating Pancasila into criminal law reform requires a contextual approach that respects social pluralism, criminal dynamics, and evolving public needs. In conclusion, Indonesian criminal law reform should move toward a legal system that not only punishes but also educates and restores—reflecting the philosophical essence of Pancasila as the ideological compass of the nation.


Keywords


Criminal; Justice; Law; Reform; Substantive.

References


Books:

Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana. Ashworth, A. (2009). Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cotterrell, R. (1992). The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. London: Butterworths.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Muladi. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas.

Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.

Cornell, D., & Muvangua, N. (2012). Ubuntu and the Law: African Ideals and Postapartheid Jurisprudence. New York: Fordham University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mukti Fajar, N. H., & Yulianto, A. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Official Documents and Reports:

Komisi Hukum Nasional. (2020). Naskah Akademik RKUHP. Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: