Analysis Of Criminal Responsibility In Cases Of Possession Or Control Of Narcotics Study Of Decision Number 22/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pso.
Abstract
Particularly in sentencing, which does not reflect substantive justice. This study analyzes Decision Number 22/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pso against defendant Piter Tanjaya, who was sentenced to five years in prison and a fine of Rp800,000,000 for possession of 1.0742 grams of methamphetamine. The results show that the application of the law is more repressive than rehabilitative, thus being less in line with the principles of justice and humanity. Reformulation of drug sentencing policies is needed to make them more proportional and oriented towards social recovery.
Keywords
References
Journals:
Azizah, N. (2020). Kebijakan Rehabilitasi Pengguna Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Modern. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Books:
Arief, B. N. (2010). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana
Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2023). Laporan Tahunan BNN tentang Statistik Penyalahgunaan Narkotika di Indonesia. Jakarta: BNN Press.
Gunarto, H. (2021). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Semarang: UNISSULA Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Regulation:
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2010). Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2010 concerning the Placement of Drug Abusers in Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions. Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Poso District Court Decision Number 22/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pso.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2021). Substantive Justice in Judges' Decisions. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
