Effectiveness of Implementing Restorative Justice in Theft Criminal Acts Based on Utility (Case Study of the Nunukan Police Resort)
Abstract
This study is entitled "The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Implementation in Expediency-Based Theft Crimes (A Case Study of the Nunukan Police Resort)". This research is motivated by the increasing application of restorative justice as an alternative to resolving criminal cases, including petty theft crimes, which emphasizes restoring relationships between perpetrators, victims, and the community. This approach is considered to provide more benefits for the parties compared to the conventional criminal justice system that is oriented towards revenge. In the context of the Nunukan Police Resort, the restorative justice approach has been used in several theft cases by considering aspects of humanity and social benefits. The research method used is socio-legal research, an approach that combines normative studies of laws and regulations with empirical analysis of field practices. Data were obtained through a literature review of legal doctrine, laws and regulations, and previous research findings, as well as through interviews and documentation at the Nunukan Police Resort. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by connecting restorative justice theory, Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory, and Satjipto Rahardjo's progressive legal theory. The research results indicate that the application of restorative justice in theft cases at the Nunukan Police Station has been quite effective, especially in cases of minor theft that do not result in significant losses. However, this effectiveness still faces several obstacles, such as limited understanding among law enforcement officers, the lack of uniform procedural standards, and the potential for injustice to victims if the mediation process is not balanced. Nevertheless, a benefit-based restorative justice approach is still considered capable of creating more humane and efficient solutions, and providing broader social benefits for both perpetrators, victims, and the community.
Keywords
References
Al-Qur’an & Hadist:
Kementrian Agama Repulik Indonesia, Al-Quran dan Terjemahan, Jakarta, 2017
Journals:
Isnaini, N. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Kasus Pencurian Ringan di Kepolisian. Jurnal Hukum UNISSULA, 6(2), 145–156.
Marsudi, U., dkk. (2020). Sengaja dan Tidak Sengaja dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 76–88.
Wahyuni, E. (2021). Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 16(2), 225–238. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA).
Books:
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014, hlm. 67–72.
Arief, B. N. (2008). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Konsep Restorative Justice. Semarang: Pustaka Magister.
Al-Ghazali, Al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993, hlm. 174.
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). Legal Culture and Social Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hamzah, A. (2012). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartanti, E. (2012). Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hidayat, A. (2020). Mediasi Penal dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. (2007). Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Muladi. (2017). Restorative Justice dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Semarang: UNDIP Press.
Prakoso, A. (2013). Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rohman, F. (2023). Rekonstruksi Konsep Mekanisme Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Terpadu di Indonesia untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum yang Berbasis Keadilan. Semarang: UNISSULA.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Soesilo, R. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.
Sudarto. (1983). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Utrecht. (1986). Hukum Pidana I. Surabaya: Pustaka Tindak Mas.
Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2022). Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice. New York: Routledge.
Wahbah Zuhaili, Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Criminal Code (KUHP)
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
Indonesian National Police. (2021). Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice. Jakarta: Indonesian National Police.
Nunukan Police Internal Report. (2023). Data on Handling of Restorative Justice Cases by the Nunukan Police in 2023. Nunukan: Nunukan Police.
Regulation of the Chief of Police Number 8 of 2016 concerning Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Minor Criminal Cases. Jakarta: Indonesian National Police.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: