Legal Problems of Authority of Effort Review By The Prosecutor Of The Judge's Decision (Research Study at the Lingga District Attorney's Office)

Andreansyah Pahlevi, Gunarto Gunarto

Abstract


Abstract. Article 263 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code is the basis for filing a judicial review, which emphasizes that extraordinary legal remedies can be filed with the Supreme Court against a court decision that has permanent legal force. Furthermore, paragraph 2 emphasizes that only the defendant or his heirs can file a judicial review. The implied meaning of this article is that the prosecutor can file a judicial review against an acquittal. There are differences in interpretation of the judicial review by the public prosecutor, which has given rise to a debate between the pursuit of justice and the achievement of legal certainty. This phenomenon is feared to have implications for disrupting the balance between the justice process and legal certainty as the goal of law. The aim of this research is to determine and analyze (1) the nature of judicial review efforts in the Indonesian criminal procedural law system, (2) the position of the Public Prosecutor in his authority to submit a judicial review of a judge's decision from a legal perspective, (3) the concept of achieving legal certainty in judicial review efforts by the Public Prosecutor in the future. The approach used in this research is sociological juridical. The research specifications are descriptive and analytical. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded: (1) Judicial review in criminal cases is regulated in Article 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code which stipulates in Paragraph 1 that for court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force, except for decisions of acquittal or release from all legal charges, the convict or his heirs can submit a request for judicial review to the Supreme Court; (2) Constitutional Court Decision Number: 33/PUU-XIV/2016 confirms that the Public Prosecutor cannot submit an extraordinary legal remedy in the form of a Judicial Review. Judicial review of the provisions of Article 263 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law is due to the applicant's loss due to the enactment of the provisions of Article 263 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law; (3) The Prosecutor's authority to submit a Judicial Review is required as a last resort in law enforcement to protect the public interest. This authority is required in cases that are classified as extraordinary crimes and are detrimental to the public interest, such as corruption.

Keywords


Keywords: Authority; Judicial Review; Prosecutor.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Arfan Faiz Muhlizi, Memperebutkan Tafsir Peninjauan Kembali, Rechtsvinding Online Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN), Volume 23 January 2015

Carolina Da Cruz, Sri Kusriyah, Widayati, & Umar Ma’ruf. The Implementation of Good Governance Principles in Admission of Prospective Civil Servants, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 5 Issue 1, March 2022

M. Jordan Pradana, Syofyan Nur, Erwin. Tinjauan Yuridis Peninjauan Kembali yang Diajukan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Lepas dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Volume 1 Nomor 2, 2020

Books:

Andi Hamzah, (1985), Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana lndonesia, Ghalia lndonesia, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta

Andi Hamzah, (1998), Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Edisi Kedua, Cet.ketujuh, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Andi Sofyan & Abd. Asis, (2014), Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta : Kencana Pramedia Group

Darji Darmodiharjo & Shidarta, (2006), Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum :Apa dan Bagaimnana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta : PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Didik Endro Purwoleksono, (2015), Hukum Acara Pidana, Airlangga University Press

K. Wantjik Saleh, (1980), Peninjauan Kembali Putusan yang Telap.Memperolep.Kekuatan Hukum Tetap, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Moeljatno, (1995), Azas-azas Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta

R. Atang Ranoemihardja, (1976), Hukum Acara Pidana, Transito, Bandung

Roihan A. Rasyid, (1989), Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama, cet, Ke2, Jakarta: CV. Pedoman Ilmu Jaya

S. Salle, (2020), Sistem Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

S.M.Amin, (1981), Hukum Acara Pengadilan Negeri, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta

Internet:

https://historia.id/politik/articles/lika-liku-peninjauan-balik-sengkon-karta-hingga-kasus-vina-P7Nm4/page/1, Accessed May 9, 2025

Regulation:

Article 1 paragraph (7) of the Criminal Procedure Code

Article 14 letter ai of the Criminal Procedure Code

Article 21 of Law No. 14 of 1970 concerning the Basic Provisions of Judicial Power

Article 67 of Law No. 14 of 1985 in conjunction with Law No. 5 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.3.2659-2678

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: