Legal Implications of Perpetrators of the Criminal Act of Livestock Theft in the Perspective of Restorative Justice (Case Study of Criminal Case Decision Number 165/Pid.B/2024/PN Bjn)
Abstract
This thesis aims to examine and analyze the legal implications for perpetrators of livestock theft from a restorative justice perspective, focusing on a case study of Decision Number 165/Pid.B/2024/PN Bjn. In the context of Indonesian criminal law, livestock theft is a form of crime that has a direct impact on the social and economic life of the community, especially in rural areas. However, a purely repressive approach to punishment often fails to address the root of the problem and provides little room for recovery for both victims and perpetrators. This type of research is normative legal research conducted through literature study, by reviewing relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The analysis focuses on how the application of the concept of restorative justice in livestock theft cases and the extent to which the judge's considerations in the decision reflect the principles of justice that emphasize the restoration of social relations, the responsibility of the perpetrator, and the involvement of the victim. The results of the study show that in Decision Number 165/Pid.B/2024/PN Bjn, the application of the restorative justice approach has not been fully considered as the main consideration in sentencing the perpetrator.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Anshari, A. (2022). Analisis tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan sebagai kejahatan terhadap harta benda. Tadulako Law Review, 7(1), 52–63. Diakses dari https://jurnal.fakum.untad.ac.id/index.php/TPS/article/download/1107/195/3885
Asmuni, A., & Putra, H. (2023). Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan yang berkeadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Riset Kriminologi, 3(2), 100–115. Diakses dari https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/download/10088/7958
Suryani, N. (2023). Urgensi penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku residivis tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan. Jurnal Judge: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 6(1), 45–59. Diakses dari https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/article/view/1076
Mardiana, S. (2024). Analisis yuridis pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan berbasis keadilan Pancasila (Studi Putusan Nomor: 771/Pid.B/2024/PN Plg). Tesis, Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Diakses dari https://repository.unissula.ac.id/38207/1/Magister%20Ilmu%20Hukum_20302300242_fullpdf.pdf
Setiawan, B. (2019). Penegakan hukum berbasis nilai keadilan substantif. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(2), 189–203. Diakses dari https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/hukum_progresif/article/download/23611/15267
Books:
Andi Hamzah, 2009, Terminologi Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Ahmad Tanzeh, & Suyitno. 2006. Dasar-dasar Penelitian. Surabaya: Elkaf.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, H. Z. 2014. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Andrisman, T. 2009. Hukum Pidana: Asas-Asas dan Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Arief, B. N. 2001. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Genta Publishing.
Arief, B. N. 2008. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Aristoteles. 2004. Nicomachean Ethics (Terjemahan oleh Terence Irwin). Hackett Publishing.
Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Barda Nawawi Arif, 1984, Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II, Fakultas Hukum UNDIP, Semarang.
Bryan A. Garner, editor, 1999, Black’s Law Dictionary, Edisi Ketujuh, West Group, Amerika.
C.T.S Kansil, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2018, h. 346
Evi Hartanti, 2006, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Hyronimus Rhiti, 2011, Filsafat Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
John Rawls, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Amerika.
Kanter dan Sianturi, 2002, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Storia Grafika, Jakarta.
Karen Leback, 2018, Teori-Teori Keadilan, Cetakan ke-6, Nusa Media, Bandung.
Kartini Kartono, Patalogi Sosial Jilid I, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013, h. 27.
L. Moleong, 2002, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Mahrus Hanafi, 2015, Sistem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Cetakan pertama, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Michael Walzer, 1983, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Basic Books, Amerika.
Moeljatna, 2007, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta.
Nussbaum, Martha, 2006, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press, Amerika.
P.A.F. Lamintang, 1984, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.
Roeslan saleh, 2017, Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Cetakan Pertama, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Ronald Dworkin, 2011, Justice for Hedgehogs, Harvard University Press, Amerika.
Rusdi Malik, 2002, Penemu Agama Dalam Hukum Di Indonesia, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1981, Pengatar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.
Simons, A. 1983. Het Nederlandsche Strafrecht. Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn.
Simons, L. 1992. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Simons, W. F. 1992. Het Nederlandse Strafrecht Hukum Pidana Belanda. Jakarta: Binacipta.
Soekanto, S. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soekanto, S. 2007. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soekarno. 1964. Pidato Pembukaan Konstituante. Jakarta.
Soesilo, R. 1996. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.
Soesilo, R. 2011. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana KUHP. Bogor: Politeia.
Sri Sumawarni. 2012. Sebuah Seri Metode Penelitian Hukum. Semarang: UPT UNDIP Press.
Sudarto. 1981. Hukum Pidana I. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Sudarto.
Sudarto. 1986. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Sri Sumawarni, 2012, Sebuah Seri Metode Penelitian Hukum, UPT UNDIP Press, Semarang.
Susan Estrich, Kelly D. Weisberg ed, 2006, Application of Feminist Legal Teory to Women’s Live: Sex, Violence Work and Reproduction, Temple Univ Press, New York.
Vos, H. 2001. Strafrechtelijk Samenwerking. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International.
Yahya Harahap. 2005. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Regulation:
Decision of the South Jakarta District Court in Decision Number: Decision on Criminal Case Number 165/Pid.B/2024/Pn Bjn.
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code
Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP)
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Etc:
http://repository.unpas.ac.id/13430/6/BAB%20II.pdf
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analisis
https://syarifblackdolphin.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/pertanggungjawaban-pidana/
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
