Legal Implications of Concealing the Origin of Assets in Money Laundering Crimes (Case Study: Supreme Court Decision Number 2011 K/Pid.Sus/2021)

Angga Aidry Ghifari, Bambang Tri Bawono

Abstract


One of the crimes that often occurs in Indonesia is money laundering, the problem that often occurs with of money laundering is that money launderers try to hide or disguise their assets which are the result of criminal acts in various ways so that they are difficult to trace by law enforcement officers. This is further supported by the globalization in the banking sector, causing many banks to become targets for money laundering crimes. a case, namely based on the Supreme Court Decision which has permanent legal force, namely the Supreme Court Decision Number 2011 K/ Pid.Sus/2021 So that based on this case the defendant has carried out a concealment of the origin of his assets in this case there needs to be a legal review in terms of "hiding" the origin of his assets in the implementation of the crime of money laundering related to proof of the act of hiding or disguising the origin of assets. The results of the study show that the regulation of norms on concealment or disguising the origin of assets in money laundering crimes in Indonesian legal provisions has not regulated further in the formulation of how to determine whether someone can be said to have concealed the origin of their assets in committing money laundering crimes, only to the extent of regulating that if someone hides the origin of assets there will be a legal consequence, so it is necessary to make a regulation that can accommodate the vacuum of the legal norm in order to achieve legal certainty, one of which is by using the follow the money approach to try to find money/property/other assets that can be used as evidence of the object of the crime. 

Keywords


Assets; Concealment; Laundering; Money.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Adiansyah, S. F., Irfandianto, M., Rato, D., & Setyawan, F. (2024). Efektivitas Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana. As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1432-1447

Aulia, A., Doorson, S., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Penadahan:(Fokus Pada Pengaturan, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Dan Penyelesaian BeIDR rinsip Restorative Justice Di Indonesia). Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 2(1), 27-38.

Apriani, T. (2019). Konsep Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak

Indraswati, A. (2019). Determinan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja dan Implikasinya terhadap E-Government: Pengujian Interaksi Money Follow Program. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(1), 43-51.

Illahi, B. K., & Alia, M. I. (2017). Pengaturan Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 2(2), 185-207.

Isnaeni, D., (2018). Implikasi Yuridis Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pemberian Ijin Usaha Pertambangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 1(1), pp.35-46.

Izazi, N., & Adiwinarto, S. (2024). Akibat Hukum Akta Notaris Yang Terkait Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 5-5.

Juanda, E. (2017). Konstruksi hukum dan metode inteIDR retasi hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4(2), 168-180.

Kridasakti, S. W., Majid, A., & Yuningsih, H. (2022). Restorative Justice Tindak Pidana “Elopement” Hukum Adat dalam Konstruksi Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi, 94-110.

Lasmadi, S., & Sudarti, E. (2021). Pembuktian Terbalik Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. REFLEKSI HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 199-2018.

Nasution, E.S., 2015. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana KoIDR orasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Mercatoria, 8(2), Pp.132-144.

Nugroho, N., Sunarmi, S., Siregar, M. and Munthe, R., 2020. Analisis terhadap Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Bank Negara Indonesia. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 2(1), pp.100-110.

Nggilu, N. M. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Gorontalo. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 5(2), 109-121.

Nisa, F. N., Makatutu, S. H., Jamil, J., Karim, L. M., & Abdullah, R. (2024). Kajian Filosofis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Maksimal Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Money Laundry. Jurnal Multidisipliner Bharasumba, 3(2), 92-103.

Siringoringo, P., Saragi, P., & Januar, I. (2023). Hasil Dari Harta Bawaan, Hadiah Dan Warisan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Honeste Vivere, 33(2), 142-150.

Sriono, S., 2016. Perjanjian Kawin Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 4(2), Pp.69-80.

Surasa, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana KoIDR orasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Perspektif Hukum Islam. Tatar Pasundan: Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 14(2), 190-198.

Suryandi, D., Hutabarat, N., & Pamungkas, H. (2020). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Jurnal Darma Agung, 28(1), 84-91.

Terina, T., & Renaldy, R. (2020). Problematika Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Melaporkan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(1), 23-35.

Tornado, A. S. (2023). Penetapan Tersangka Investasi Bodong (Binary Option) dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Sagacious, 10(1).

Udaya, I.W.W.J., Dewi, A.A.S.L. And Widyantara, I.M.M., (2023). Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyembunyian Kekerasan Seksual Pada Wanita Dan Anak. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), Pp.55-60.

Books:

Adrian Sutedi, S.H., (2018). Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Andi Sofyan, (2013), Hukum Acara Pidana Yogyakarta: Suatu Pengantar Rangkang Education.

Amiruddin dan Asikin, Zainal. (2012), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Djulaeka, S.H. And Devi Rahayu, S.H., (2020). Buku Ajar: Metode Penelitian Hukum. Scopindo Jakarta: Media Pustaka.

Eddy OS. Hiarieej, (2012),Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Hamzah, A. (2015). Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) Di Dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ruslan Renggong, S. H. (2017). Hukum Pidana Khusus. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Sukinto, I. Y. W., & SH, M. (2022). Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Di Indonesia: Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Waluyo, B., (2022). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Grafika

Wiyono, R., (2022). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Bandung: Sinar Grafika.

Dissertation:

Riyadi, S. (2019). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Peredaran Gelap Narkotika Melalui Pendekatan Follow the Money (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Sumatera Utara).

Suleaman, A. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Perbandingan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Menurut Hukum Pidana Positif Dengan Hukum Pidana Islam (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).

Regulation:

Criminal Code

Civil Code

Compilation of Islamic Law

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering

Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Regulation of the Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center Number 1 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Submitting Reports of Suspicious Financial Transactions, Cash Financial Transactions, and Financial Transactions Transferring Funds from and to Abroad Through the Goaml Application for Financial Service Providers

Court Decision Number 2011 K/Pid.Sus/2021

Circular Letter of the Attorney General Number SE-004/JA/11/1993 concerning the Preparation of Indictments

Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (MLCA)

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: