Effectiveness of Termination of Prosecution of Narcotics Abusers Based on a Restorative Justice Approach

Arin Pratiwi Quarta

Abstract


Punishment of narcotics and dangerous drug abusers has proven to be ineffective. This is a common thread in law enforcement against narcotics users. The purpose of this research is to determine and analyze the implementation of cessation of prosecution of Narcotics Abusers Based on the Restorative Justice Approach; identify and analyze obstacles in implementing the termination of prosecution of Narcotics Abusers Based on the Restorative Justice Approach. determine and analyze the effectiveness of terminating prosecution of Narcotics Abusers Based on the Restorative Justice Approach. The approach method used in this research is the normative juridical approach. In principle, narcotics abusers are guaranteed medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation as regulated in article 4 point (d), and also Article 54 of the Narcotics Law. However, because the Indonesian Criminal Justice System adheres to the principle of legality, in general practice, all narcotics cases include narcotics users. For those who are not dealers, they are usually also processed legally in accordance with legal norms. Obstacles to the prosecutor's office in implementing efforts to stop prosecutions with restorative justice that often occur include the following: There are disparities in the legal process, obstacles also arise from addicts and narcotics abusers (external factors) such as being involved in narcotics trafficking networks. The effectiveness of stopping prosecutions by the Prosecutor's Office using a restorative justice approach based on legal system theory, there are several weaknesses in terms of legal substance, namely the absence of stopping prosecutions using restorative justice in the Criminal Procedure Code, in terms of legal structure, differences in understanding regarding restorative justice between law enforcers, in terms of current legal culture, narcotics addicts most were sentenced to prison and rarely sentenced to rehabilitation measures.


Keywords


Addict; Effectiveness; Narcotics.

References


Arry Djaelani, Kristiawanto, Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Perkara Penyalahgunaan Narkotika, Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Imiah Hukum, Volume 8 Nomor 2 September 2022

Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten Bantul, Rehabilitasi Bagi Penyalahguna Narkoba Dalam Implementasi Restorative Justice, https://bantulkab.bnn.go.id/rehabilitasi-bagi-pegguna-narkoba-dalam-implementasi-restorative-justice/

Burhan Bungin, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, Universitas Airlangga Press, Surabaya, 2006, h. 36.

Kusno Adi, Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak, Malang: UMM Press, 2009, hlm. 30.

M. Friedman, Lawrence, Amirikan Law An introduction, second edition, Hukum Amirika Sebuah Pengantar, Pentrjemah Wisnu Basuki, PT. Tata Nusa, Jakarta,2001, hlm 21

Meuwissen, Tentang Pengembanan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum, (terjemahan B. Arief Shidarta), PT Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2008, hlm. 20.

Oheo K. Haris, “Telaah Yuridis Penerapan Sanksi di Bawah Minimum Khusus pada Perkara Pidana Khusus”, JurnalIus Constituendum, Volume 2, Nomor 2, 2017, hlm. 241

Oheo K. Haris, “Telaah Yuridis Penerapan Sanksi di Bawah Minimum Khusus pada Perkara Pidana Khusus”, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Volume 2, Nomor 2, 2017, hlm. 241.

Rizal, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemidanaan Bagi Pengguna Narkotika”, Legal Opinion, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2021, hlm. 2.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Yurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, h.56

Ronny Nicolas Sidabutar, Alvi Syahrin, Penyelesaian Perkara Narkotika Bagi Penyalahguna Sebagai Korban Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Kajian Norma Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila, Jurnal Hukum Kaidah. Vol. 23, No. 1, 2023, hlm. 10-26

Suwardi Sagama, Analisis Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan, Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2016, hlm. 24.

Suyatno, Kelemahan Teori Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence M. Friedman Dalam Hukum Indonesia, Ius Facti, Vol 2 No 1, Juni 2023, hlm 23

Syaiful Asmi Hasibuan, Christian Antonio Pardamean Tarigan, Nugraha Manuella S. Meliala, & Rachel Agatha Christi Hutabarat. Restorative Justice Sebagai Bentuk Hukum Progresif Dalam Peraturan Perundang Undangan Indonesia Tidak Untuk Menggantikan Keadilan Retributif. Indonesian Journal of Law, 1(1), 2024, hlm 14–25




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: