Implementation Of Replacement Money Payments With Confidential Assets Owned By The Offender In Corruption Crime Cases (Case Study at the Wajo District Prosecutor's Office)
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine and analyze the implementation of replacement money payments by confiscating assets belonging to perpetrators in cases of criminal acts of corruption; to find out and analyze obstacles in the implementation of replacement money payments in the form of confiscation of assets belonging to perpetrators in corruption cases and their solutions; to find out and analyze the effectiveness of implementing replacement money payments by confiscating assets owned by perpetrators in cases of criminal acts of corruption. This research is included in the sociological research tradition, namely research that examines the application of legal rules or norms using legal science and social science approaches. The process of implementing the decision on replacement money carried out by the prosecutor goes through the court stage, the auction stage, and the payment stage for replacement money. The effectiveness of implementing replacement money payments by confiscating assets owned by perpetrators in corruption cases can be seen from 3 (three) Weaknesses in legal substance: the lack of regulation of the criminal issue of replacement money in existing anti-corruption laws. Weaknesses of the legal structure: This problem stems from one problem, namely the lack of adequate human resources to cover this problem. Ideally, when it comes to calculating the amount of loss, it must be carried out by an institution that has competence and is professional in its field, for example the BPK or a public accounting firm (auditor) which operates in this field. Weaknesses of legal culture: the social reality of many Indonesian people still views corruption as a solution and alternative to anticipate future economic difficulties. This thought was ultimately used as a justification and excuse for those who were corrupt.
Keywords
References
Erfaniah Zuhriah, Model Small Claim Court Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan Agama Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls, De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah Vol. 11, No. 2, 2019, page. 128-142
Arizon Mega Jaya, Implementasi Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cepalo, Vol 1 No 1, Juli-Desember 2017: page. 19-28.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2007, page. 21.
Beni Kurnia Illahi, Optimalisasi Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad), Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol 6 Nomor 1 Februari 2023, page. 35-56
Edi Setiadi dan Kristian, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2017, page.
Hasanah, Lutfiatul. Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006). Jurnal Anti Korupsi, Vol. 11, No. 2, July 2022, page. 41-55,
Jawade Hafidz Arsyad, 2017, Korupsi dalam Perspektif HAN, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Page. 168.
Jhonny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Malang, 2011, page. 295.
Muhlashin, I. Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(1), 2021, page. 87-100.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi. A, (1998) Teoriteori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, page. 91
Romli Atmasasmita, 2001, Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia & Penegakan Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung, page. 55.
Sudarto, “Mekanisme Perampasan Aset dengan Menggunakan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, Vol. V, No. 1 (Januari-Juni 2017), page. 111
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2010, page. 48
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
