Implications of the Debtor's Reverse Evidence in the Actio Pauliana Case In Bankruptcy Law Based on Efforts to Protect The Creditor's Interests

Deras Tirta Milenia

Abstract


The growth of the business community in Indonesia, driven by technological advances and globalization, has facilitated international business but also created challenges, especially during financial crises such as the one that occurred in 1997. In the context of bankruptcy, the concept of Actio Pauliana is important to protect creditors from detrimental transactions made by debtors before the declaration of bankruptcy. This study analyzes the application of Actio Pauliana in bankruptcy law in Indonesia with a focus on the debtor's reverse burden of proof, which requires the debtor to prove that the transactions made do not harm the creditor. Normative legal research methods are used to understand the related regulations, with a statutory, conceptual, and case study approach. The results of the study indicate that Actio Pauliana and reverse burden of proof play an important role in protecting creditors' rights and mitigating the negative impacts of detrimental transactions. Suggestions for improvement include explaining the role of the curator, strengthening the supervision mechanism, and adding reverse burden of evidence rules to the Civil Code to strengthen legal certainty and third party protection.

Keywords


Actio Pauliana; Bankruptcy; Reverse.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Anindra, Charla Ferina. “IMPLEMENTATION OF CURATOR’S AUTHORITY IN FILING ACTIO PAULIANA SUIT (Study of Case Verdict Number 01/Pdt.Sus/ActioPauliana/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst).” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 22, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.872.

Christy, Evie, Wilsen Wilsen, and Dewi Rumaisa. “Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferensi Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kasus Kepailitan.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 22, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i2.14909.

Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. “Implentasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati 1, no. 2 (2019).

Disemadi, Hari Sutra, and Danial Gomes. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 9, no. 1 (2021).

Hasanah, Aida Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Gugatan Actio Pauliana.” Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam 9, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v9i2.4574.

Hidayat, M. Taufik. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA AKIBAT KESALAHAN KURATOR DARI BERKURANGNYA HARTA DEBITUR PAILIT YANG MERUGIKAN PIHAK KREDITUR DALAM KEPAILITAN.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v7i14.226.

Ikhlas, Nur. “Legitimasi Hadis Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar Sebagai Pesan Dakwah.” Journal of Da’wah 1, no. 1 (2022).

Irwan, Tania. “Implementasi Upaya Pemulihan Aset Korban Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Pencucian Uang Dalam Kasus First Travel.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 5, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i4.2223.

Jaang, Syaharie. “Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 05 (2023). https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i05.303.

Made Martia Surya Anandewi, Ida Ayu Sukihana. “Actio Pauliana Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Kreditor Dalam Kepailitan.” Jurnal Kertha Desa 9, no. 11 (2020).

Mantili, Rai. “ACTIO PAULIANA SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN BAGI KREDITOR MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU).” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.127.

Ni Made Mirah Dwi Lestari, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ni Gusti Ketut Sri. “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Debitur Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4740.176-181.

Saleh, Putra Akbar. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG MENGABAIKAN BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI DI DALAM PERSIDANGAN.” LEX ET SOCIETATIS 1, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v1i1.1313.

Setyabudi, Albertus Hansen, Sylvia Janisriwati, and Irta Windra Syahrial. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK KETIGA DALAM ACTIO PAULIANA.” Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM 9, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5771.

Skripsi. “TANGGUNG JAWAB KURATOR ATAS KESALAHAN DAN/ATAU KELALAIANNYA MENENTUKAN BOEDEL PAILIT (HARTA PAILIT) DALAM KEPAILITAN.” File:///C:/Users/VERA/Downloads/ASKEP_AGREGAT_ANAK_and_REMAJA_PRINT.Docx 21, no. 1 (2020).

Susanti Ante. “Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen II, no. 2 (2013).

Books:

Brahmana, H. S. “Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian.” Pn-Lhoksukon.Go.Id, 2012.

Daud Ali, Mohammad. “Hukum Islam : Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 2005.

Sinaga, Syamsudin M. “Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia.” Eprints.Unram.Ac.Id, 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.3.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: