Legal Analysis of Disparity in Judges' Decisions Regarding the Implementation of the Element of State Financial Loss in Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.991-1000Keywords:
Corruption, Decisions, Disparity, Judge.Abstract
This research aims to analyze and describe the disparity in judges' decisions regarding the application of the element of state financial loss in criminal acts of corruption; To analyze and describe the weaknesses in the disparity in judges' decisions regarding the application of the element of state financial loss in criminal acts of corruption and what the solution is. This writing uses legal system theory and progressive legal theory, a sociological juridical approach method, research specifications are descriptive analysis, data sources consist of primary data and secondary data taken from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials, data collection techniques through observation and interview. The results of this research are the first to apply the element of loss in the Supreme Court's efforts to avoid disparities in criminal punishment for criminal acts of corruption stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines Article 2 and Article 3 of the PTPK Law which are not accompanied by adjustments to statutory regulations such as the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code. to support this system, thereby giving rise to disparities. The two weaknesses in the legal structure are odd legal considerations and odd judgement considerations. The weakness of the legal substance is that state losses are only regulated in articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law and differences in the meaning of state finances in various statutory regulations. Weaknesses of Legal Culture, namely family culture, paternalistic societal orientation, and a societal culture that lacks the courage to be frank. The solution to the weaknesses in implementing elements detrimental to state finances is that first, the Government and DPR are expected to make improvements to Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes means that there needs to be a paradigm shift in understanding between law enforcement and coordination agencies, so that there is the same perception in understanding the elements of criminal acts of corruption.References
Bambang Tri Bawono, Faktor-Faktor Yang Menjadi Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Berat/Ringannya Pidana Terhadap Terdakwa, Jurnal Hukum, 2004
Eddy Mulyadi Soepardi, Memahami Kerugian Keuangan Negara sebagai Salah Satu Unsur Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Ceramah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor. 24 Januari 2009
Fatah, A., Jaya, N. S. P., & Juliani, H. Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diponegoro Law Journal, 2016,
Jawade Hafidz, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Perkara Korupsi Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyelamatan Uang Negara, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2011
Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Penindakan Perkara Krupsi ICW 2023
Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Penindakan Perkara Krupsi ICW 2022
Leo Nugroho, Mengaji Ulang keberadaan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Disampaikan dalam Focus Group Discussion “Mengaji Ulang keberadaan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, 17 September 2013.
Miftakhul Khobid, Gunarto, Analisa Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 2018
Resdian Wisudya Kharismawan, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Kebijakan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Secara Bersama-Sama Dan Berlanjut, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 2017
Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif. Hukum Yang Membebaskan, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 1, No. 1/April 2005, Program Doktor Undip Semarang
Vito Tanzi, Corruption, Governmental Activities, and Markets, IMF Working Paper, Agustus 1994
Yudi Kristiana, Rekontruksi Birokrasi Kejaksaan Dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Studi Penyidikan, Penyelidikan, dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tesis PDIH UNDIP Semarang, 2006
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi, teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana, Almni, Bandung, 2005
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Revisi, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
