The Existence of the Prosecutor's Office in Implementing the Principle of a Single Prosecution System

Herwansah Herwansah

Abstract


The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the paradigm of the existence of the Prosecutor's Office in implementing the principle of a single prosecution system. The approach method used in this writing is normative juridical. This writing specification is analytical descriptive. Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the formulation of Article 2 of the Prosecutor's Law which confirms the position of the prosecutor's office or public prosecutor in terms of implementing state power in the field of prosecution and other authorities based on the law independently have not been implemented ideally. It is necessary to understand the empirical, philosophical and juridical background regarding the principle of the Single Prosecution System and its implications for prosecution policy from the perspective of the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. The role of the prosecutor as a single public prosecutor or single prosecution system is a basis for carrying out the duties of the prosecutor's office which aims to maintain a unified prosecutorial policy that displays unique characteristics that are integrated in the behavior, thinking and work procedures of the prosecutor's office. What prosecutors must have is professional expertise, both in terms of understanding and insight.


Keywords


Existence; professional; Prosecutor.

References


Adhe Ismail Ananda, Constitutionalism Concept in Implementation of Indonesian Staten Administration, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 4 Issue 2, June (2021)

Ahmad Firmanto Prasedyomukti and Rakhmat Bowo Suharto, The Role of Judicial Commission on Supervision of Judge’s Crime in Indonesia, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 1 Issue 4 December (2018)

Edita Elda, Arah Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia: Kajian Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol.1 No.2, (2019)

Hutahaean, Armunanto dan Erlyn Indarti, Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 16 Nomor 1, Maret (2019)

Irfan Ardiansyah, Pengaruh Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, Vol.17 No. 1, (2017)

M. Thalhah, Penegakan Hukum oleh Kejaksaan dalam Paradigma Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Magister Hukum, Vol.1 No.1, (2005)

Rangga Trianggara Paonganan, Kewenangan Penuntutan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dan Kejaksaan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, Vol.2 No.1, (2013)

Sri Praptini, Sri Kusriyah, and Aryani Witasari, Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia, Jurnal Internasional Daulat Hukum, Volume 2 Issue 1, March (2019)

Sulistiyawan Doni Ardiyanto, Eko Soponyono and Achmad Sulchan, Judgment Considerations Policy in Decree of the Court Criminal Statement Based On Criminal Destination, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 3 Issue 1, March (2020)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.771-780

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: