The Domination of the Prosecutor's Office Changes the Sentencing Paradigm Towards Restorative Justice

Arwan Kamil Juanha

Abstract


The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the role of the Prosecutor's Office in seeking restorative justice according to authority. In this writing the author uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. The position of the prosecutor is the main and strategic axis in the criminal law enforcement process. Because it plays a role from the start of the investigation (pre-adjudication stage), prosecution and examination in court (adjudication stage), up to the implementation of the court decision (post-adjudication stage). The Attorney General's Office issued prosecutor's regulation number 15 of 2020 concerning stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice. Another background to this regulation is that the Prosecutor's Regulations which were stipulated on 21 July 2020 give the Public Prosecutor (JPU) the right to stop prosecuting cases against defendants in cases certain, if the parties involved have agreed to make peace. Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice which is regulated in Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, guidelines for Public Prosecutors to stop prosecutions by paying attention to justice, public interest, proportionality, punishment as a last resort, and fast, simple and low cost. There are 2 (two) types of methods for terminating case prosecution, including peace efforts and peace processes.


Keywords


Justice; Paradigm; Prosecutor; Restorative.

References


Andi Hamzah, RM Surachman, (2015), Pre Trial Justice dan Discretionary Justice Dalam KUHAP Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Basrief Arief, (2013), Peran Kejaksaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Menata Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu, Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press

Eva Achjani Zulfa dan Indriyanto Seno Adji, (2011), Pergerseran Paradigma Pemidanaan, Lubuk Agung, Bandung

Moh. Mahfud MD, (2011), Politik Hukum di Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Ahmad Faizal Azhar, (2019), Penerapan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4, 2

Ardito Yudho Pratomo, Umar Ma'ruf, and Aryani Witasari. (2021). Implementation of Criminal Action Prosecution Online in Realizing Principle of Fast Prosecution, Simple & Low Cost. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4 (2)

Farid Achmad, (2019), Urgensi Penguatan Peran Penuntut Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, VII (1)

Haposan Siallagan, (2016), Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum di Indonesia, Sosiohumaniora, 18 (2)

Henny Saida Flora, (2018), Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, UBELAJ, 3 (2)

Nur Rochaeti, (2013), Prospek Peradilan Restoratif Berdasarkan Pancasila sebagai Sarana Non Penal dalam Penanggulangan Delinkuensi Anak Dimasa Datang. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42 (4)

Septian Nanang Pangestu, and Lathifah Hanim. (2021), The Role of Prosecution Related to Prosecutor's Demand in Enforcing the Criminal Action of Narcotics. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4 (1)

Vivi Ariyanti, (2019), Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6 (2)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: