Intelligence Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Executing Arrests of Corruption Perpetrators

Ahmad Sudarmaji

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to find out, examine and analyze the authority of the Prosecutor's Intelligence in carrying out intelligence operations to execute arrests of perpetrators of corruption. In this writing the author uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. One of the important aspects of intelligence activities in carrying out operations to catch perpetrators of corruption is the Prosecutor's Office intelligence, namely through investigative activities to be able to anticipate, identify, detect and solve various problems facing the nation. Intelligence is also always faced with problems that are completely secret, vague or full of enigmas, for this reason intelligence always works in complete secrecy, so that intelligence is often called a secret service where intelligence must be able to solve problems that are full of secrets and in secret with all the risks. An Intelligence Operation for the execution of Arrest is an attempt by the Prosecutor's Office to catch someone suspected of being the perpetrator of a criminal act of corruption red-handed. An operation that is secretive, measurable and rarely targets operations that can survive accusations because it is based on a long process when the Prosecutor's Office "sniffs" that there are indications of criminal acts of corruption.


Keywords


Arrest; Corruption; Intelligence; Prosecutor.

References


Danr Krisnawati, dkk, (2006), Bunga Rampai Hukum pidana Khusus, Pena Pundi Aksara, Jakarta

Loch K.Johnson, (2002). Bombs, Bugs, Drugs and Thugs: Intelligence and America’s quest for security. New York: New York University Press

Zainal Arifin Mochtar, (2017), Lembaga Negara Independen, Depok: Pt Raja Grafindo Persada

Abdul Kholiq Nur and Gunarto, (2021), Concept of Criminal Law on Corruption of Corporate Criminal LiabilitySystem Based on Justice Value, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4 (1)

Arthur S. Hulnick, (2007), Indications and Warning for Homeland. Security: Seeking a New Paradigm, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, Journal Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 18 (4)

Harold Nielson, (1995), The German Analysis and Assessment System. Intelligence and National Security. 10 (4)

Jack. Davis, (1996). A Policymaker.s Perspective on Intelligence Analysis. Studies in Intelligence. 38 (5)

Masyhadi Irfani and Ira Alia Maerani, (2019), Criminal Code Policy in The Effort of Corruption Prevention inInstitutions Regional Disaster Management Agency, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1)

Sri Praptini, Sri Kusriyah and Aryani Witasari, (2019), Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1)

Supriyono, (2020), Criminology Study of Crime of Fencing the Stolen Goods, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3 (1)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: