Progressive Legal Perspective on the Death Penalty in Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the punishment of the death penalty in positive law and the reform of criminal law in Indonesia in relation to Article 100 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code from a progressive legal perspective. This research uses a normative legal approach. The theoretical approach taken is to use the theory of legal objectives, the theory of justice, the theory of punishment, and various other legal theories that are relevant in supporting an appropriate analysis of the death penalty in the Indonesian ius constitutum and ius constituendum. Based on the research, it can be concluded that 1) the Criminal Code as Ius Constitutum is a Dutch colonial legacy and the current theory of punishment in the death penalty which is applied adheres to the Relative Theory (Purpose Theory) but is not strictly regulated in the form of norms. The death penalty sanction in Indonesian positive law is found in a number of laws both inside and outside the Criminal Code. 2) Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code has formulated and emphasized the Relative Theory (Objective Theory) in the form of norms as a means of preventing crime. Article 100 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code also regulates the concept of a conditional death penalty which focuses on improving the behavior of the convict in order to obtain a change in the sentence from the death penalty to life imprisonment with several conditions. Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code as Ius Constituendum generally reflects criminal law reform which is progressive in nature and focuses on the human side of punishment, but still requires improvement in determining the appropriate criteria as a condition for imposing a conditional death sentence. by the judge.
Keywords
References
Agus Sahbani, dalam Artikel https:// m.hukumonline.com/ berita/ baca/ lt5a42131b82c60/ sekilas-sejarah-dan-problematika-pembahasan-rkuhp/, Sekilas Sejarah dan Problematika Pembahasan RKUHP, diakses pada 04 November 2023.
Bahder Johan Nasution, “Kajian Filosofis Tentang Hukum Dan Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern”, Jurnal Yustisia, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2014.
Haris Wahyu Sunarno and Akhmad Khisni, Analysis of Criminal Liability as Doer of Preening Criminal (Case Study in the Blora State Court), Jurnal Internasional Daulat Hukum, Volume 3 Issue 1, March 2020. url: http://jurnal. unissula.ac.id/ index.php/ RH/ article/ view/ 8779/4074.
Iqbal Hasanuddin, “Telaah atas Filsafat Politik John Rawls”, Jurnal Refleksi, Vol. 17 No. 2, 2018.
Maryanto, Refleksi dan Relevansi Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Bagi Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum, Jurnal Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Vol. 13 No.1, 2003.
Muhammad Adiel Aristo, Criminal Law Policy against Actor of Criminal Performance Persecution, Jurnal Internasional Daulat Hukum, Volume 3 Issue 1, March 2020, url: http:// jurnal.unissula.ac.id/ index.php/ RH/issue/view/434
Muhammad Yamin, Jalan Tengah Hukuman Pidana Mati Ala Profesor Muladi, Hukum online, 2020. https:// www.hukumonline.com/ berita/ baca/ lt5f8cdd3c7c243/ jalan-tengah-hukuman-pidana-mati-ala-profesor-muladi? page=all (diakses pada tanggal 04 November 2023).
Supriyono, Criminology Study of Crime of Fencing the Stolen Goods, Jurnal Internasional Daulat Hukum, Volume 3 Issue 1, March 2020, url: http:// jurnal.unissula.ac.id/ index.php/ RH/ article/ view/ 8407/ 4068
Tim Institute for Criminal Jutice Reform (ICJR), Politik Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa, Jakarta, 2017.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: