Juridical Implications of Discrepancies in the Results of Road Improvement Work with the Contents of the Work Contract Agreement

Ngadino Ngadino

Abstract


This research aims to analyze: 1) 1) The legal implications of the discrepancy between the results of the Bantarsari-Cikerang road improvement work and the contents of the work contracting agreement in the 2019 regional revenue and expenditure budget in Cilacap Regency. 2) Legal responsibility for discrepancies in the results of the Bantarsari-Cikerang road improvement work with the contents of the work contracting agreement in the 2019 regional revenue and expenditure budget in Cilacap Regency. This type of research falls within the scope of sociological juridical research. The approach method used in this research is a qualitative approach. The type of data uses primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature study. The data analysis method used in this research was carried out qualitatively. The research results concluded: 1) The juridical implication regarding the discrepancy between the results of the Bantarsari-Cikerang road improvement work and the contents of the work contracting agreement in the 2019 regional revenue and expenditure budget in Cilacap Regency is that the PPK party can terminate the contract unilaterally, because the service provider has been proven to have defaulted on employment agreement. In the event that the contract is terminated during the implementation period due to an error by the service provider, the performance guarantee is disbursed, the remaining down payment must be paid by the service provider or the down payment guarantee is disbursed, the service provider is subject to blacklisting sanctions. 2) Legal responsibility for discrepancies in the results of the Bantarsari-Cikerang road improvement work with the contents of the work contracting agreement in the 2019 regional revenue and expenditure budget in Cilacap Regency is the Service Provider or PT. ETT must be legally responsible. Apart from being included as a blacklisted service provider, PT. ETT must also provide compensation by paying off the remainder of the down payment or collateral disbursed. Regarding the sanctions given, it must be proven that a breach of contract has actually occurred which resulted in losses for one of the parties. Regarding compensation, it must be calculated materially and regarding matters for which the party declared in default can be held responsible.


Keywords


Agreement; Improvement; Road.

References


Cokorde Istri Dian, 2020, Tanggung Jawab Atas Wanprestasi Pada Jasa Konstruksi Akibat Pandemi Covid-19, Yustitia / Articles, Vol 14 No 1

Farida Azzahra, Retno Kus Setyowati, dan Asmaniar, 2019, Pemutusan Perjanjian Pemborongan Bangunan Secara Sepihak Akibat Wanprestasi, Jurnal Krisna Law, Volume 1 tahun 2019.

Fitri Yanni, 2019, Tanggungjawab Penyedia Jasa Konstruksi Terkait Kegagalan Konstruksi dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, SU Law Journal, Volume 7 Nomor 5.

Muhammad Noor, Juni 2015, Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Perikatan Dalam Membuat Kontrak, Mazahib, Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol. XIV, No. 1.

Munir Fuady, 2014, Konsep Hukum Perdata, Cetakan Pertama, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.Ganti Kerugian Oleh Penyedia Jasa Apabila Terjadi Kegagalan Bangunan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol.XI/No.5.

R. Tony Prayogo, 2016, Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (The Implementation Of Legal Certainty Principle In Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Of 2011 On Material Review Rights And In Constitutional Court Regulation Number 06/Pmk/2005 On Guidelines For The Hearing In Judicial Review), Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 13 No. 02, Jakarta.

Rimbun Siallagan, Analisis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/ Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement) Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Barat, Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIMAP). Universitas Kutai Kartanegara Tenggarong.

Sumini dan Amin Purnawan, 2017, Peran Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Notariil, Jurnal Akta, Volume 4 Nomor 4.

Timbul Mangaratua Simbolon, Gunarto dan Umar Ma’ruf, 2018, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penghinaan Atau Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Internet Di Indonesia Sebagai Cybercrime, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 1 (1), Published Master Of Law, Faculty of Law Unissula.

Umi Wahyu Nurhayati, Amin Purnawan dan Ira Alia Maerani, 2019, Law Enforcement Against Liquor Circulation, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Volume 2 (4), Published Master Of Law, Faculty of Law Unissula.

Abdulkadir Muhammad, 1992, Hukum Perikatan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

F. X. Djumialdji, 1996, Perjanjian Pemborongan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Hasanuddin Rahman, 2003, Contract Drafting Seri Keterampilan Merancang Kontrak, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

J.Satrio, 1995, Hukum Perikatan-Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian Buku 1, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Kansil, 1994, Pokok-Pokok Pengetahuan Hukum Dagang Indonesia Buku Kesatu Hukum Dagang Menurut KUHD Dan KUHPerdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 1996, KUH Perdata Buku III: Hukum Perikatan denganPenjelasan. Alumni, Bandung.

Munir Fuady, 1998,Kontrak Pemborongan Mega Proyek, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: