Implementation of Short Examination Events (APS) & Classification of Offenders in Handling Criminal Cases of Narcotics Abuse

Muhammad Ardian Firmansyah, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih

Abstract


This research aims to determine the effectiveness of the Attorney General's Circular Letter Number: B-029/A/EJP/03/2019 concerning the Handling of Narcotics Crime and Narcotics Abuse Cases with Short Examination Procedures (APS) at the Kendal District Prosecutor's Office. The next objective is to find out the Public Prosecutor's legal thinking in classifying Narcotics abusers and to know the Public Prosecutor's considerations in considering the implementation of assessment activities in order to classify Narcotics abusers. This research uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analysis research methods. The data used is primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. Research problems are analyzed using the theory of legal objectives, the theory of legal certainty. The results of the research show that the Public Prosecutor at the Kendal District Prosecutor's Office does not and/or has not implemented the Short Examination Procedure (APS) method in criminal cases of narcotics abuse in accordance with the mandate of the Attorney General as stated in the Attorney General's Circular Letter Number: B-029/A/EJP /03/2019. The reason why the Short Examination Procedure (APS) was not implemented is related to the quantity of criminal cases which can be said to be not too many being submitted to the Kendal District Prosecutor's Office, so that the Public Prosecutor has plenty of time to implement the Ordinary Examination Procedure (APB). Then the classification of narcotics abusers at the Kendal District Prosecutor's Office is only classified based on the Public Prosecutor's assessment without going through assessment activities. In efforts to eradicate Extraordinary Crime, the Public Prosecutor at the Kendal District Prosecutor's Office does not look at more humane provisions, so this is the reason why the Public Prosecutor is reluctant to carry out assessments.


Keywords


Abuse; Classification; Examination; Narcotics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Bayu Praise Hariyanto. "Prevention and Eradication of Drug Trafficking in Indonesia". Journal of Legal Sovereignty. Vol 1 No 1. March 2018.https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/2634/1983. Access December 11, 2023.

Dina Novitasari "Rehabilitation of Child Victims of Narcotics Abuse". Khaira Ummah Law Journal. Vol 14 No 4 December 2019.http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2567/1924.

M. Usrin. Juridical Analysis of the Principles of Simple, Fast Justice and Low Costs in the Criminal Justice System. Unpal Journal Vol 16 No 1 January 2018.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih and Rismanto. "Criminal Law Enforcement Policy for Combating Money Laundering in the Context of Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia". Journal of Legal Reform. Volume II No. January 1. April 2015.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318566646_KEBIJAKAN_PENEGAKAN_HUKUM_PIDANA_TERHADAP_PENANGGULANGAN_MONEY_LAUNDERING_DALAM_RANGKA_PEMBAHARUAN_HUKUM_PIDANA_DI_INDONESIA.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. The Urgency of Reforming Indonesian Material Criminal Law Based on the Values of the Almighty God. Journal of Legal Reform. Volume 1 No.1. January. April 2014.https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1457/1128.

Sulchan, A., & Ghani, M. (2017). Public Prosecutor's Prosecution Mechanism for Child Crimes.Ulul Albab: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies and Research, 1(1), 110-133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i1.2218.

Books:

Mardjono Reksodiputro. Human Rights in the Criminal Justice System (Collection of Essays). First Edition. Third Book. Seventh Printing. Center for Justice Services and Legal Services, University of Indonesia. Jakarta. 2007.

Rena Yulia. Victimology Legal Protection for Crime Victims. Science House. Yogyakarta. 2013.

Soerjono Soekanto. Factors Affecting Law Enforcement. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. 2007.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. Principles of Criminal Individualization in Islamic Criminal Law and Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law. Diponegoro University Semarang Publishing Agency. 2013.

Teguh Prasetyo. Abdul Halim Barkatullah. Politics of Criminal Law. Criminalization and Decriminalization Policy Review. Student Library. Jakarta. 2005. Pp. 96-97.

Regulation:

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.

Joint Regulation of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, Head of the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 01/PB/MA /III/2014, Number 03 of 2014, Number 11 of 2014, Number 03 of 2014, Number PER-005/A/JA/03/2014, Number 1 of 2014, Number PERBER/01/III/2014/BNN Concerning Handling Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Rehabilitation Institutions.

Attorney General's Guidelines Number 18 of 2021 concerning Settlement of Criminal Cases of Narcotics Abuse through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach as Implementation of the Prosecutor's Dominus Litis Principle.

Attorney General's Circular Letter (SEJA) Number: B-029/A/EJP/03/2019 concerning the Handling of Narcotics Crime and Narcotics Abuse Cases with a Short Examination Procedure.

Regulation of the Head of the National Narcotics Agency Number 11 of 2014 concerning Procedures for Handling Suspects and/or Defendants of Narcotics Addicts and Victims of Narcotics Abuse in Rehabilitation Institutions

Criminal Case Indictment No. Reg. Perk. PDM - 25/KNDAL/Enz.2/4/2021 on behalf of the Defendant Sandy Setiawan Alias Cebong Bin Suran Dwi Santoso.

Decision Number 54/Pid.sus/2021/PN. Kdl.

Internet:

https://kejari-kendal.kejaksaan.go.id/. Public Information. Kendal District Prosecutor's Office Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) 2022. Access 11 December 2023. 14.55 WIB.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.4.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: