Analysis of Criminal Disparities against The Offenders of Theft Crimes With Weighting

Pipin Erfiana

Abstract


Research purposesthis isstudy and analyzethe disparity of the judge's decision against the perpetrators of the crimecrime of theft with weighting in Decision Number 81/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbrand To review and analyzethe judge's consideration of the decisioncriminal disparity against the perpetrators of the crime of theft by weighting the Decision on Case Number 81/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbr.This study uses a sociological juridical approach. The results of this study showthat from the two judges' decisions in the crime of theft with weighting there is a criminal disparity, due to the subjective and objective factors of the judge, namely the applicable legal system, legislation, originating from the panel of judges, criminal events, demands from the Public Prosecutor, aggravating matters and relieve the accusedAndBasethe judge's considerations that led to disparities in criminal justice regarding the crime of theft by weighting, among others, based on the facts and evidence at trial, the actions of the Defendant have fulfilled the elements of the formulation of Article 365 paragraph (1) 4th and 5th of the Criminal Code

Keywords


Criminal; Disparity; Theft; Weighting.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number182/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbr.

Directory of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number81/Pid.B/2021/PN Sbr.

Een Indriyanie Santoso and Gunarto, "Criminal Disparity Against Children's Cases (Case Study at the Demak District Court)", in Khaira Ummah Law Journal Vol 15, No 4 December 2020,https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2605/1959

Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar, 2016, The Law of Evidence (Analysis of Independencejudge as law enforcer in the evidentiary process), Bandung: CV Nuance Aulia.

https://www. Hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/review/cl1679/yurisprudensi/,

Isakh Benyamin Manubulu, 2018, The Inspirational Concept of Court Decisions: Problems and Efforts to Minimize Disparities in the Decision Making Process for Corruption CrimesIn Indonesia, West Denpasar: Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Udayana University.

Muladi and Barda Nawawi Arief,2010,Criminal theories and policies, 4th Printing,Bandung:alumni.

R. Soenarto Soerodibroto, 2006, Criminal Code & Criminal Procedure Code, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Romli Atmasasmita, 1996, Criminal Justice System, Bandung: Cipta Bina.

Soerjono Soekanto, 2014, Factors Affecting Law Enforcement, 13th Print,Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2006, Indonesian Civil Procedure Code. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Tama S.Langkun, 2014, Study of Disparities in Decisions on Criminal CasesCorruption, Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW).

Tutik Quarterly Point, 2008, Construction of Indonesian State Administration after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution, Surabaya: Kencana.

Wahyu Nugroho, DISPARITY OF PENALTIES IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES WITH GROWTH A study of Decisions Number 590/Pid.B/2007/PN.Smg and Number 1055/Pid.B/2007/PN.Smg. Vol 5 No 3, Judicial Journal, 3 December 2012

Widiyani Ratna Furi, Criminal Disparity in Violent Theft Crimes at the Sleman District Court, Vol 6 No 1, Recidive, April 2017

Yesmil Anwar and Adang, 2009, Criminal Justice System, Concept, Components &Its Implementation in Law Enforcement in Indonesia, Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: