Kinerja Pelayanan Petikemas Di Pelabuhan: Komparasi Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya Dan Pelabuhan Di Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/jpsa.v17i2.7915Abstract
The focus of this paper is to evaluate the container services at Port of Tanjung Perak and compare it with other ports in Asia. A list of twenty (20) attributes is used as an assessment indicator with a five-point Likert scale, then analyzed using Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) matrixes to measure service quality from users perspective. The results of the analysis addressed the CSI value of this study was 69.21% which refers to the service of the Port of Tanjung Perak Surabaya included in the category of satisfied. The IPA matrixes of the Port of Tanjung Perak confirm that three attributes were the main priorities for improved performance, namely related to congestion at the port, efficiency on-dock operation of containers at port and integration into intermodal transport system. In the ‘Assurance’ dimension, Port of Tanjung Perak is in the fourth position, above the Shanghai Port in China. In the ‘Tangible’, ‘Relability’, ‘Emphaty’ and ‘Responsiveness’ dimensions, Port of Tanjung Perak still needs to make continous improvements.
References
Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyality: The Key to Great Profitability. New York: American Management Association.
Budi, T. P. (2006). SPSS 13.0 Terapan; Riset Statistik Parametrik. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi Offset.
Dawes, J. (2002). Five Point vs Eleven Point Scales: Does It Make Difference To Data Characteristics? Australasian Journal of Market Research, 10(1), 1–17.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.
Dwarakish, G. S., & Salim, A. M. (2015). Review on the Role of Ports in the Development of a Nation. Aquatic Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.040
Jafari, H., Saeidi, N., & Karim Karimi, M. (2013). Importance-performance analysis of port’s services quality form perspective of containerized liner shipping. Management Science Letters, 3(6), 1743–1750. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2013.05.008
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2015). Manajemen Pemasaran (13th ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Lee, P. T.-W., & Hu, K.-C. (2012). Evaluation of the Service Quality of Container Ports by Importance-Performance Analysis. Int. J. Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2012.047479
Likert, R. (1932). Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/1250495
Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H.-J. (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018-0027-0
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL : A multiple- Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Pham, T. Y., & Yeo, G. T. (2019). Evaluation of Transshipment container terminals’ service quality in Vietnam: From the shipping companies’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11051503
Prasetyo, S. A., Wicaksono, A., & Anwar, M. R. (2014). Evaluasi Sistem Logistik di Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Surabaya. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 8(2), 113–120.
Riyanto, A. H., & Riyanto, B. (2015). Analisis Peningkatan Pelayanan Stasiun Bogor Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Kereta Api dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis ( IPA ). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 11(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v11i4.11549
Supriyono. (2013). Analisa Kinerja Terminal Petikemas di Tanjung Perak Surabaya ( Study Kasus : PT . Terminal Petikemas Surabaya ). Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 19(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v19i1.7838
Syarifuddin, M. F., Musadieq, M. Al, & Yulianto, E. (2016). Pentingnya Pelabuhan Tanjung Perak Bagi Perekonomian Jawa Timur ( Studi pada PT . PELINDO III Tanjung Perak Surabaya ). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 35(1), 172–178.
Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.
Tjiptono, F. (2015). Strategi Pemasaran (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Ugboma, C., Ibe, C., & Ogwude, I. C. (2004). Service quality measurements in ports of a developing economy: Nigerian ports survey. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 14(6), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410569829
Ugboma, C., Ogwude, I. C., Ugboma, O., & Nnadi, K. (2007). Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: An exploration. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830701539073
Ugboma, C., Ugboma, O., & Damachi, B. (2009). A comparative assessment of service quality perspectives and satisfaction in ports: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2009.024494
Yamit, Z. (2004). Manajemen Kualitas Produk dan Jasa (Yogyakarta). Ekonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![](/index.php/psa/manager/setup/<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img%20alt="Creative%20Commons%20License"%20style="border-width:0"%20src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png"%20/></a><br%20/>This%20work%20is%20licensed%20under%20a%20<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative%20Commons%20Attribution%204.0%20International%20License</a>.)
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
