PRIA VERSUS WANITA: SIAPA YANG LEBIH MENIPU DALAM PRESENTASI DIRI ONLINE DI SITUS JEJARING SOSIAL?
Abstract
Berkencan melalui situs jejaring sosial mempermudah pengguna untuk menampilkan diri sesuai dengan keinginan, baik secara jujur maupun menipu. Hal ini memicu timbulnya perilaku online deceptive self-presentation (ODSP). Meskipun banyak ditemukan, prevalensi perilaku ini di Indonesia masih belum diketahui. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbedaan ODSP pada pria dan wanita dalam dua domain, yakni daya tarik fisik dan pencapaian pribadi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif-komparatif, dengan populasi pengguna situs jejaring sosial berusia 17 – 35 tahun. Non-probability sampling digunakan sebagai teknik sampling, khususnya convenience sampling. Skala deceptive self-presentation versi bahasa Indonesia digunakan sebagai alat pengumpulan data, dengan reliabilitas 0,834. Uji-t dengan software JASP 0.18.1.0 dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbedaan mean dari kedua sampel independen. Penelitian ini memperoleh N = 315 (pria = 106; wanita = 209) dengan mean usia = 22,4 tahun (SD = 3,1). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan t = 5,068 dan p < 0,001 yang artinya terdapat perbedaan tingkat ODSP pada pria dan wanita. Nilai t = 3,012 dan p = 0,003 dalam daya tarik fisik serta t = 6,558 dan p < 0,001 dalam pencapaian pribadi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan tingkat ODSP pada pria dan wanita dalam kedua domain tersebut. Tingkat perilaku ODSP pada pria dalam kedua domain, yaitu daya tarik fisik (mean = 1,311) dan pencapaian pribadi (mean = 0,821) lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan wanita. Tingkat perilaku ODSP pada wanita dalam daya tarik fisik (mean = 0,914) dan pencapaian pribadi (mean = 0,120) lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan pria.
Dating through social networking sites makes it easier for users to present themselves as they wish, either honestly or deceptively. This triggers the emergence of online deceptive self-presentation behavior (ODSP). Although widely found, the prevalence of this behavior in Indonesia is unknown. This study was conducted to determine the differences in ODSP in men and women in two domains, namely physical attractiveness and personal achievement. This study is a quantitative-comparative study, with a population of social networking site users aged 17-35 years. Non-probability sampling was used as a sampling technique, specifically convenience sampling. The Indonesian version of the deceptive self-presentation scale was used as a data collection tool, with a reliability of 0.834. A t-test with JASP 0.18.1.0 software was conducted to determine the mean difference between the two independent samples. This study obtained N = 315 (men = 106; women = 209) with a mean age = 22.4 years (SD = 3.1). The results of this study showed a t-value of 5.068 and p-value of <0.001, indicating a different level of ODSP between men and women. The t-value of 3.012 and p-value of 0.003 for physical attractiveness and the t-value of 6.558 and p-value of <0.001 for personal achievement indicate a different level of ODSP between men and women in both domains. Men's levels of ODSP behavior in both domains, namely physical attractiveness (mean = 1.311) and personal achievement (mean = 0.821), were higher than women's. Women's levels of ODSP behavior in physical attractiveness (mean = 0.914) and personal achievement (mean = 0.120) were lower than men's.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buss, D M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic books.
Buss, David M. (2023). The Sexual Selection of Human Mating Strategies: Mate Preferences and Competition Tactics. In J. K. Mogilski & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Romantic Relationships (pp. 15–41). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197524718.013.1
Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590987
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The Nature–Nurture Debates: 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613484767
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0000337x
Gil-Or, O., Levi-Belz, Y., & Turel, O. (2015). The “Facebook-self”: characteristics and psychological predictors of false self-presentation on Facebook. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00099
Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 642–647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.010
Guillory, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). The effect of Linkedin on deception in resumes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0389
Hall, J. A., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509349633
Howe, S. (2023). Social Media Statistics for Indonesia [Updated 2023]. Meltwater. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/social-media-statistics-Indonesia
Kolesnyk, D., de Jong, M. G., & Pieters, R. (2021). Gender Gaps in Deceptive Self-Presentation on Social-Media Platforms Vary With Gender Equality: A Multinational Investigation. Psychological Science, 32(12), 1952–1964. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211016395
Labor, J. S. (2020). Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps. Plaridel, 17(1), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.52518/2020.17.1-09labor
Langit, A. (2022). 5 Fakta Tinder Swindler Indonesia yang Viral di Twitter, Korban Lebih dari Satu. Parapuan. https://www.parapuan.co/read/533190101/5-fakta-tinder-swindler-indonesia-yang-viral-di-twitter-korban-lebih-dari-satu
Lee, H., Choi, J., & Kim, K. K. (2013). Impact of anonymity (unlinkability, pseudonymity, unobservability) on information sharing. PACIS Proceedings, 70.
Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
Lo, S.-K., Hsieh, A.-Y., & Chiu, Y.-P. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.010
Michikyan, M., Dennis, J., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2014). Can You Guess Who I Am? Real, Ideal, and False Self-Presentation on Facebook Among Emerging Adults. Emerging Adulthood, 3(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814532442
Michikyan, M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Dennis, J. (2014). Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online self-presentation among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.010
Olckers, C., & Hattingh, M. J. (2022). The Dark Side of Social Media-Cyberbullying, Catfishing and Trolling: A Systematic Literature Review. EPiC Series in Computing, 84, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.29007/qhl5
Peng, K. (2020). To be attractive or to be authentic? How two competing motivations influence self-presentation in online dating. Internet Research, 30(4), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0095
Peng, K., Lin, W.-Y., & Chen, H. (2022). Consequences of deceptive self-presentation in online dating. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2052130
Ranzini, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5, 101–180. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151910121
Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.022
Saha, K., Reddy, M. D., Mattingly, S., Moskal, E., Sirigiri, A., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). LibRA: On LinkedIn Based Role Ambiguity and Its Relationship with Wellbeing and Job Performance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3(CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359239
Saputra, B. (2023). Mengaku Polisi Lampung, Pelaku Love Scammer Peras Wanita Pensiunan Guru dari Pamekasan Rp 426 Juta. Tribunbandarlampung.Com. https://lampung.tribunnews.com/2023/04/03/mengaku-polisi-lampung-pelaku-love-scammer-peras-wanita-pensiunan-guru-dari-pamekasan-rp-426-juta
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X05000051
Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2018). Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date. New Media & Society, 21(1), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792425
Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2017). Life-Span Human Development (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and Lies: The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Online Dating Self-Presentation and Deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356437
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318067
World Economic Forum. (2023). Global Gender Gap Report 2023. In World Economic Forum (Issue June). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf
Zytko, D., Grandhi, S. A., & Jones, Q. (2014). Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660410
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jp.20.1.71-84
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Proyeksi by https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/proyeksi/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.