KEPERCAYAAN DAN KOMITMEN PADA RELASI DEKAT: ANALISIS JALUR DAN IMPLEMENTASI JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan memprediksi kepercayaan dan komitmen pada relasi dekat dalam dua tahap studi. Studi 1 dilakukan untuk menguji jalur antara penyesuaian, dependensi, kepercayaan, dan komitmen pada relasi dekat dengan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Studi 2 dilakukan untuk memprediksi tingkat kepercayaan dan tingkat komitmen dengan menambah jenis kelamin dan jenis relasi sebagai prediktor dengan implementasi Jaringan Saraf Tiruan (JST) model Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), yang dilakukan dalam 27 percobaan (3 hidden layer x 3 learning rate x 3 epoch) untuk masing-masing tingkat kepercayaan dan tingkat komitmen. Studi 1 dan Studi 2 dilakukan terhadap 417 responden (103 pria, 314 wanita; 97 pacaran, 320 persahabatan). Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan kuesioner adaptasi Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (11 aitem; α = 0,78), Investment Model Scale (15 aitem; αdependensi = 0,886; αkomitmen = 0,933), dan Trust in Close Relationship Scale (13 aitem; α = 0,917). Hasil Studi 1 menunjukkan pengaruh penyesuaian dan dependensi terhadap kepercayaan; serta pengaruh dependensi dan kepercayaan terhadap komitmen pada relasi dekat. Hasil studi 2 menunjukkan model JST terbaik untuk memprediksi tingkat kepercayaan ialah dengan konfigurasi 4 hidden layer units, 0,75 learning rate, dan 1000 epochs dengan tingkat akurasi sebesar 75,85%; sementara, model JST terbaik untuk memprediksi tingkat komitmen ialah dengan konfigurasi 4 hidden layer units, 0,75 learning rate, dan 2500 epochs dengan tingkat akurasi sebesar 79,95%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Z., & Musa, R. (2014). The effect of trust and information sharing on relationship commitment in supply chain management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.031
Agnew, C. R., & Vanderdrift, L. E. (2018). Commitment processes in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 437–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.034
Anatassia, D. F., & Faturochman. (2017). Pencederaan kepercayaan pada persahabatan remaja. In Faturochman, W. M. Minza, & T. A. Nurjaman (Eds.), Memahami dan mengambangkan indigenous psychology (pp. 113–134). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bricci, L., Fragata, A., & Antunes, J. (2016). The effects of trust, commitment and satisfaction on customer loyalty in the distribution sector. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.7763/joebm.2016.v4.386
Chow, C. M., & Tan, C. C. (2013). Attachment and commitment in dyadic friendships: Mediating roles of satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Journal of Relationships Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2013.4
Faturochman, & Nurjaman, T. A. (2018). Pendahuluan: Relasi sosial. In
Faturochman & T. A. Nurjaman (Eds.), Psikologi relasi sosial (pp. 1–11). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fife, B. L., Weaver, M. T., Cook, W. L., & Stump, T. T. (2013). Partner interdependence and coping with life-threatening illness: The impact on dyadic adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 702–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033871
Firmansyah, M. R., Amelia, R., Jamil, R. A., Faturochman, F., & Minza, W. M. (2019). Benevolence, competency, and integrity: Which is more influential on trust in friendships? Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.91-105
Fitzpatrick, J., & Lafontaine, M. F. (2017). Attachment, trust, and satisfaction in relationships: Investigating actor, partner, and mediating effects. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 640–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12203
Houde, L., Sherman, D., White, T., & Sheppard, B. (2004). The four faces of trust: An empirical study of the nature of trust in relational forms. In N. Haslam (Eds.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 287-306). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Karan, A., Wright, R. C., & Robbins, M. L. (2016). Everyday emotion word and personal pronoun use reflects dyadic adjustment among couples coping with breast cancer. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12165
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lahav, Y., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Solomon, Z. (2017). Posttraumatic growth and dyadic adjustment among war veterans and their wives. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01102
Lampis, J., Cataudella, S., Agus, M., Busonera, A., & Skowron, E. A. (2018). Differentiation of self and dyadic adjustment in couple relationships: A dyadic analysis using the actor-partner interdependence model. Family Process, 58(3), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12370
Lemay, E. P. (2016). The forecast model of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000052
Liang, L. J., Choi, H. C., & Joppe, M. (2018). Exploring the relationship between satisfaction, trust and switching intention, repurchase intention in the context of Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.015
Ling, F. Y. Y. (2015). Effect of trust and satisfaction on interpersonal relationships: Comparative study of capitalist and socialist countries. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000235
Morrison, M. M., & Komarraju, M. (2015). Effect of culture on relationship satisfaction, dyadic adjustment, and commitment. Association for Psychological Science (APS) Convention. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986311435974
Nurjaman, T. A. (2016). Skema dan manifestasi in[ter]dependensi pada pertemanan antara penyandang tunanetra dan individu awas. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000129
Pourshahriar, H. (2012). Correct vs. accurate prediction: A comparison between prediction power of artificial neural networks and logistic regression in psychological researches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.017
Rahmanawati, A., Ferdian, F. R., Widyastuti, T., Faturochman, & Minza, W. M. (2020). How do relational and personal attributes affect trust in adolescent friendship : An exploratory model. Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v17i1.12700
Rotenberg, K. J. (2019). The relation between interpersonal trust and adjustment: Is trust always good? Trust in Contemporary Society, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430
Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218-231). London: SAGE Publications
Tran, P., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2019). Commitment in relationships: An updated meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 26(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12268
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 251-272). London: SAGE Publications
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 942–966. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942
Yamaguchi, M., Smith, A., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2015). Commitment signals in friendship and romantic relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.05.002
Zeng, Y., & Xia, L. X. (2019). The relationship between interpersonal responsibility and interpersonal trust: A longitudinal study. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0083-5
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jp.17.2.1-12
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Proyeksi by http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/proyeksi/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.