Enhancing Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ English Mathematical Communication through AI-Assisted Differentiated Instruction: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.10.2.%25pAbstrak
English mathematical communication is a required competence for pre-service mathematics teachers in the era of global education. However, many students have trouble expressing mathematical thinking in English academic language. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of AI-assisted Differentiated Instruction (DI) on the English mathematical communication of pre-service mathematics teachers and to investigate students’ learning experiences throughout the intervention. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was utilized. 21 pre-service mathematics teachers participated in the study. The quantitative data were analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, effect size, and N-gain analysis. Additionally, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected participants and were analysed using thematic analysis. The quantitative results revealed a statistically significant improvement in English mathematical communication (Z = 2.385, p = 0.017) with a large effect size (r = 0.52) after the intervention. However, the N-gain analysis results showed low gains in all dimensions of communication, with the least gain in communicating the problem-solving steps. In qualitative findings, generative AI was conducive to reflective mathematical communication, while DI alleviated communication anxiety by catering to different readiness levels, interests, and learning styles. However, limited English mathematical vocabulary remained a challenge.
Keywords: AI-assisted learning, differentiated instruction, English mathematical communication skills
Referensi
Abidin, Z. (2018). Mathematical communication caracteristics of pre-service primary school teacher in explaining the area of trapezoid reviewed from school origin. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu
Bolton, K., Bacon-shone, J., & Botha, W. (2023). EMI (English-medium instruction) across the Asian region. World Englishes, 42, 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12620
Bolton, K., Peyronnin, K., Hill, C., & Bacon-shone, J. (2023). EMI (English-medium instruction) in Indonesian higher education. World Englishes, 42(3), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12622
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Budiyono. (2016). Statistika untuk penelitian. UNS Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaces (V. Knight (ed.); Third Ed). Sage Publications, Inc.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(22), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research; competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Guler, N. K., Dertli, Z. G., Boran, E., & Yildiz, B. (2024). An artificial intelligence application in mathematics education: Evaluating ChatGPT ’ s academic achievement in a mathematics exam. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14145
Hayuni, A. A., Setyaningsih, N., Murtiyasa, B., & Masduki. (2025). Hypothetical learning trajectory based on realistic mathematic education with the theme of entrepreneurship to support students’ mathematical communication skills. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3333, No. 1, p. 020028). https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/3333/1/020028/3372385/Hypothetical-learning-trajectory-based-on
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 478). The Center for Curriculum Redesign, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2940-3_16
Kasneci, E., Bannert, M., Sessler, K., Stefan, K., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Stephan, G., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., & Seidel, T. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103(102274), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lethulur, N. D., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2025). The effectiveness of discovery, inquiry, problem, and project-based learning in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(1), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp268-279
Liu, J., Sun, D., Sun, J., Wang, J., Leung, P., & Yu, H. (2025). Designing a generative AI enabled learning environment for mathematics word problem solving in primary schools: Learning performance, attitudes and interaction. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9(Desember), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100438
Liu, Z., Zuo, H., & Lu, Y. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(4), e70096. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70096
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of chatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English Learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
Nketsia, W., Opoku, M. P., & Amponteng, M. (2024). Exploring the perceived knowledge of teacher educators and pre-service teachers on the differentiated instruction practices of teacher educators. Frontiers in Education, 9(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1356675
O’Halloran, K. L. (2014). perspectiveThe language of learning mathematics: A multimodal perspective. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40(Part A), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.09.002
Rahmi, C. N., & Chrisdiyanto, E. (2024). Improving communication , problem-solving , and self-efficacy skills grade-10 students through scientific approach based on discovery learning. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v9i1.2448
Shahat, M. A., Al-Busaidi, F., Al-Ghafri, M., & Bahri, K. Al. (2025). Navigating linguistic transitions: Pre-service science and math teachers’ perspectives on English as a medium of instruction in professional preparation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16397
Smale-jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Systematic Review, 10(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
Sutama. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: kuantitaif, kualitatif, penelitian tindakan kelas, mix method, r&d (Cetakan 1). CV. Jasmine.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., & Hickey, D. T. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2015). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of Gifted, 27(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353203027002
Trisni, R., & Sutarni, S. (2019). Peningkatan komunikasi matematik siswa melalui pendekatan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) IV Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/knpmp/article/view/1949
Turmuzi, M., Azmi, S., & Kertiyani, N. M. I. (2026). ChatGPT in school mathematics education: A systematic review of opportunities, challenges, and pedagogical implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 170, 105286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105286
Wahyuni, S. E., & Rejeki, S. (2022). Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dengan penerapan pendekatan realistic mathematics education. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1487–1500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5027
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Sri Rejeki, Rini Setyaningsih, Christina Kartika Sari, Syahara Dina Amalia, Gemma F. Quintana
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and and full publishing rights without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
