The Relevance Of Justice Value In Compensation Of Victims Of Law Implementation

Sugeng Aribowo

Abstract


In its development, Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 about the second amendment of Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983 about Compensation and Settlement of Amounts of Compensation has problems related to the amount of fines regulated in Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 about the second amendment of Government Regulation Number 27 1983 about Compensation and Settlement of Amount of Compensation. So it is necessary to discuss the relevance of the value of justice in the implementation of compensation for victims of law enforcement errors. The method used is non-doctrinal. From the results of the research, it was found that the implementation of compensation for victims of law enforcement error was not fair. This was shown by the amount of compensation which was only 500,000.00 IDR (five hundred thousand rupiah); As for the causes of the implementation of compensation for victims of law enforcement error are not yet fair due to weaknesses in terms of legal regulations, difficulty in accessing legal aid for the poor, and the lack of the government’s role; So it is clear that the implementation of compensation for victims of law enforcement error is contrary to the mandate of the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. So that the implementation of compensation for victims of errors in implementing the law has not been able to bring justice.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad Irwan Hamzani, dkk., 2019, Cita Hukum Pancasila di antara Pluralitas Hukum Nasional, Proceedings of the National Seminar on Transcendental Law Doctoral Program in Law, Surakarta Muhammadiyah University

Djoko Prakoso, 1988, Masalah Ganti Rugi Di Dalam KUHAP, Bina Aksara, Jakarta

Julius Ibrani, Review Singkat PP No. 27 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pelkasanaan KUHAP, Retrieved from ylbhi.or.id, on 12 May 2019

LBH Jakarta, Hakim Kabulkan Ganti Kerugian Pengamen Cipulir,

Retrieved from www.bantuanhukum.or.id, on 12 Mei 2019

P.J.P Tak, 1970, Schade Vergoeding voor Ondegane Voorlopige Hechtenis on Straf, Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht Deel Lxxix afl 1

Soedirjo, 1986, Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana Arti dan Makna, Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta

Syarif Abdul Rohmani dan Umi Rozah, Kebijakan Kriminal Mengenai Pemberian Ganti Kerugian terhadap Korban Kesalahan penerapan hukum, Journal of Indonesian Legal Development Master of Law Study Program Volume 2 No. 1 of 2020

Tongat, Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Falsafah Negara dan Makna Filosofisnya dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Journal of Legal Issues Vol. 41, No.3


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.