The Criminal Aspect Of Transfer Of Fidusia Securities As A Basis Of Rules In The Criminal Jurisdiction Process

Suwanto Suwanto

Abstract


The existence of a fiduciary guarantee provision makes it easy for credit seekers without having to hand over physically pledged goods such as in a pawn. In its implementation, fiduciary is not only used by entrepreneurs, but also by the general public. Initially, fiduciary objects were only moving objects, but in its development it can also be applied to fixed objects. After the issuance of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary, it further emphasizes that if there are defaults such as examples of embezzlement, it has become a criminal jurisdiction. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical. This research specification is descriptive analytical. The data source used is secondary data. Secondary data with literature study and document study. Qualitative data analysis and problems were analyzed using guarantee theory, legal certainty theory, and punishment theory. Based on the results of the research it can be concluded that the criminal aspects that exist in the transfer of fiduciary security objects are contained in the criminal provisions of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security and Articles of the Criminal Code which can ensnare the perpetrator if they fulfill the criminal elements in the Criminal Code, as well as obstacles in optimization. The criminal provisions of the fiduciary guarantee law come from internal factors of law enforcers and external faculty regarding the transfer of objects of fiduciary security and weaknesses in the substance of the criminal provisions of the fiduciary guarantee law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung Pratama Armawinata, 2015, Efektivitas Pasal 480 KUHP dalam putusan pengadilan terhadap tindak

pidana penadahan kenderaan bermotor, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo;

Andri Winjaya Laksana, Suratman, Analisis Yuridis Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pornografi Berdasarkan

Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 Di Era Digitalisasi, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume I

No. 2 Mei-Agustus 2014;

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus, 1987, Bab-Bab tentang Credietverband, Gadai dan Fiducia, Alumni, Bandung;

Djuhaedah Hasan, 1996, Lembaga Jaminan Kebendaan Bagi Tanah dan Benda Lain yang Melekat pada

Tanah Dalam Konsepsi Penerapan atas Pemisahan Horizontal, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

J. Satrio, 2002, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

H.L. Packer, 1969, The Limits of The Criminal Sanction, Stamford University Press, California;

H.Salim HS, 2008, Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak Innominat di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Hasanuddin Rahman, 1995, Aspek-aspek Hukum Pemberian Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia, Citra Aditya

Bakti, Bandung;

Kamello Tan, 2014, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan, Alumni, Bandung;

Moch.Isnaeni, 1996, Hipotek Pesawat Udara Di Indonesia, CV Dharma Muda, Surabaya;

Muladi, 2002, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat, Alumni, Bandung;

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta;

Sri Soedewi M, 1977, Beberapa Masalah Pelaksanaan Lembaga Jaminan Khususnya Fidusia di Dalam

Praktek dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta;

Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo, Fery Kusnaini Afandi, Studi Terhadap Tindakan Penyidik dalam Menangani

Sindikat Penadahan Atas Objek Jaminan Hasil Transaksi Fidusia di Polresta Malang, Fakultas Hukum,

Jurnal UM Malang, Vol. 27 No.1, Agustus 2019;

Yurizal, 2003, Aspek Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang No.42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Tesis,

Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya;


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.