Reconstruction of Corporate Criminal Liability Based on Structural Errors in the New Criminal Code

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/551fhe62

Keywords:

Corporations, Criminal, Errors, Liability, Structural

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the National Criminal Code, the urgency of regulating corporate criminal liability in the National Criminal Code by comparing the application of corporate criminal liability in other countries, and analyzing the ideal concept of reconstructing corporate criminal liability based on structural errors in national criminal law to realize legal benefits. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical research. The research approaches used are the Statutory Regulation Approach, Conceptual Approach, Case Approach, Historical Approach, and Comparative Approach. The types and sources of legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The collection of legal materials was carried out using the legal materials inventory technique. The results of the study show: (1) The regulation of corporate criminal liability in the National Criminal Code shows a fairly progressive development compared to the previous Criminal Code regime. The National Criminal Code has recognized corporations as subjects of criminal law that can be held accountable, and regulates the mechanism for imposing responsibility on both corporations and their managers; (2) The urgency of implementing corporate criminal law in the National Criminal Code cannot be separated from the increasing complexity and wider impact of corporate crime on society, the state, and the economy. When compared with countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom, Indonesia is still relatively behind in developing a model of accountability based on compliance (compliance-based liability) and corporate legal culture (corporate culture); (3) The ideal concept of regulating corporate criminal liability in national criminal law to realize legal benefits basically demands a fundamental paradigm reconstruction from the individual liability approach to structural liability, considering that corporate crime is no longer individual, but systemic and rooted in policies, governance, and corporate organizational culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Lusi Fitriyani S, Jambi University
    ACADEMICIAN
  • Hafrida Hafrida, Jambi University
    ACADEMICIAN
  • Sahuri Lasmadi, Jambi University
    ACADEMICIAN

References

Journals:

Affan, Muhammad, & Muhammad Zainuddin Sunarto. 2026. “Ketidakefektifan Pencegahan Pernikahan Dini di Indonesia: Analisis Sistem Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman.” Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, Vol. 7, No. 2, 838–852.

Agustinus, Akwila, & Ridwan Arifin. 2025. “Corporations and Environmental Crimes: A Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability in Indonesia.” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1405–1433.

Aisyah, Radina Nur, & Yovita Arie Mangesti. 2026. “Akibat Hukum dari Ketidakjelasan Makna Frasa Merugikan Perekonomian Negara pada Pasal 2 Ayat (1) dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Jo. Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2711–2717.

Alhadi, Muhammad Syahril, Rahma Maulidia, & Nella Yantiana. 2024. “Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Kemampuan dan Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Mengatasi Risiko Kesalahan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 21, No. 2, 195–204.

Andriani, Henny. 2023. “Model Rekrutmen Hakim sebagai Penyelenggara Kekuasaan Kehakiman Menurut Konsepsi Negara Hukum.” UNES Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2287–2298.

Arrahman, Dila Nurul Maghfira, et al. 2025. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Korporasi: Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia.” Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry, Vol. 1, No. 2, 195–203.

Asnawi, M. Iqbal. 2025. “Implikasi Pengakuan Korporasi sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana dalam KUHP Nasional: Kajian Aspek Konseptual dan Normatif.” International Journal of Demos (IJD), 47.

Biyoto, Imam, Sri Yuni Hastuti, & Ridho Sa’dillah. 2026. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Efektivitas Pengaturan Sanksi Denda dan Pidana Tambahan Pasca UU Cipta Kerja dan KUHP Baru.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1–26.

Fadlly, Fadlly, Muhammad Zulfian Ramadhan, & Fuad Nur. 2026. “Konsistensi Keberadaan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali dalam KUHP Nasional.” Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1711–1718.

Faisal, Faisal, & Muhammad Rustamaji. 2021. “Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana dalam RUU KUHP.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), Vol. 10, No. 2, 291–308.

Hanyfah, Zaskia, Agnes Oktapia, & Mirtha Tirta. 2024. “Analisis Penghitungan Kerugian Negara dari Hasil Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh PT Timah (Tbk).” Journal of Law and Nation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 351–358.

Harefa, Safaruddin, & Muhammad Alvin Nashir. 2025. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Kasus Pelanggaran Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 1, 36–60.

Herawati, Ellyana, et al. 2025. “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tanggung Jawab Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Luar Biasa di Bidang Ekonomi.” Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 7, 2819–2831.

Hermawan, Hermawan, & Agus Jati Waluyo. 2025. “Rekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, Vol. 28, No. 2, 244–254.

Januardy, Ivans, & Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang. 2026. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis dan Kriminologis Berdasarkan KUHP.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 3938–3955.

Karuni, Iluh Diah, & Tania Novelin. 2025. “Korporasi sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana: Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” 655–671.

Pratama, Diaz Jorge, Nuraliah Ali, & Satriya Nugraha. 2025. “Studi tentang Implikasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Ekonomi.” 158–171.

Pratama, Muhamad Hafidz Cahya, Fristia Berdian Tamza, & Eko Raharjo. 2025. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pelaku Perusakan Hutan (Analisis Putusan No. 35/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk).” Jurnal Mitra Pengembangan Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2, 11–20.

Pratiwi, Intan, & Lola Yustrisia. 2026. “Analisis Pemidanaan terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi (Analisis Pertimbangan Putusan Tingkat Pertama Pengadilan Negeri Muara Bulian Nomor 5/Pid.Sus.Anak/2018/PN Mbn dan Putusan Tingkat Banding Pengadilan Tinggi Jambi Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.Anak/2018/PT JMB).” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 2, 3563–3578.

Pravifjayanto, Mochammad Rafi. 2025. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi atas Kejahatan terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 55, No. 1, 89–102.

Rinanti, Pitra, & Handoyo Prasetyo. 2025. “Model Pemidanaan Korporasi Berbasis Efek Jera dalam Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2371–23.

Saputera, Januar Agung, et al. 2025. “Rekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam KUHP Nasional: Telaah Kritis atas UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Modern.” The Juris, Vol. 9, No. 2, 388–394.

Satriyawan, Yohanes Sabbat. 2025. “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Skandal Keuangan BUMN: Studi Kasus PT Asabri dan PT Asuransi Jiwasraya.” Jurnal Sumber Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 1, 23–41.

Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua, & Krusitha Meilan. 2025. “Evolusi Kejahatan dan Pemidanaan: Tantangan dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Penologi Modern.” Res Nullius Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 87–97.

Surya, Prakasa Ragil, et al. 2024. “Korporasi sebagai Subjek Hukum dan Pertanggungjawabannya dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Puan Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. 2, 718–726.

Tanjung, Sumekar. 2015. “Identifikasi Strategi Representasi Maskulinitas pada Majalah Transnasional di Indonesia.” Communication, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1–14.

Thaher, M., et al. 2026. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Tekanan Struktural terhadap Penggunaan Diskresi Penyidik dalam Proses Penyidikan.” Consensus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 3, 221–227.

Wahyuni, Syaefa. 2024. “Makna Korporasi sebagai Subjek Hukum dalam Pembaharuan KUHP Indonesia.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 3051–3061.

Weno, Angreini Wiranti, Harly Stanly Muaja Muaja, & Frits Marannu Dapu. 2025. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Ahli Hukum pada Perusahaan dan Kaitannya dengan Pembatasan Aksi Korporasi.” Lex Administratum, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1–17.

Wibowo, Ari. 2025. “Hukum Publik sebagai Arsitektur Insentif: Memikirkan Kembali Desain Hukum untuk Penerapan Kebijakan dalam Reformasi Layanan Sipil.” Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sinesia, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1–20.

Wijaya, Ersalmaika Aprilian, Nuzulia Kumalasari, & Firman Floranta Adonara. 2026. “Penguatan Kepastian Hukum dan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan melalui Sistem Perizinan Investasi Berbasis Risiko yang Terstruktur di Indonesia.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, 331–342.

Yusni, Muhammad, & Bisdan Sigalingging. 2024. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Rangka untuk Deterrence Effect dan Effective Deterrence.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 2, 425–437.

Books:

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, & John Spencer (eds.). 2002. European Criminal Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engelhart, Marc. 2018. “Corporate Criminal Liability from a Comparative Perspective.” Dalam The Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences: A Comparative Perspective, diedit oleh Katalin Ligeti. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Hardiyanti, Diah Pitaloka, et al. 2024. Dasar Hukum: Kajian Khusus Teori Hukum di Indonesia. PT Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Ibrahim, Johnny. 2006. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Ligeti, Katalin (ed.). 2018. The Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences: A Comparative Perspective. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Mustikasari, Erni. 2024. Dekonstruksi Hukum Korporasi Si Pembuat Delik. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Nieto Martín, Adán. 2014. “Corporate Compliance: A New Instrument for Preventing Corporate Crime.” Dalam Preventing Corporate Corruption: The Anti-Bribery Compliance Model, diedit oleh Stefano Manacorda et al., 23–45. Cham: Springer.

Rasiwan, Iwan. 2025a. Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. AMU Press.

Rasiwan, Iwan. 2025b. Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif dalam KUHP Nasional: Jalan Tengah Hukum Pidana. AMU Press.

Sjawie, Hasbullah F. 2017. Direksi Perseroan Terbatas serta Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Wibowo, Agus. 2025. Teori Hukum Umum: Analisis Aturan, Penalaran, Konstitusi. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

How to Cite

Reconstruction of Corporate Criminal Liability Based on Structural Errors in the New Criminal Code. (2026). Law Development Journal, 8(3), 1474-1495. https://doi.org/10.30659/551fhe62