Legal Liability of Stock Influencers and Jurisdictional Constraints of Investor Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Capital Market

Authors

  • Marihot Janpieter Hutajulu Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
  • Faqi Rawni Arndanijariah Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia
  • Ellen Christy Andre Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/6spx5r84

Keywords:

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Capital Market, LAPS SJK, Legal Liability, Stock Influencer

Abstract

The surge of retail investors in Indonesia is closely tied to the rise of uncertified stock influencers whose promotional hyping frequently triggers market manipulation and substantial financial losses. This study examines the legal liability framework for stock influencers under Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Market (UUPM) and critically evaluates the jurisdictional constraints of resolving investor-influencer disputes through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) under POJK No. 61/POJK.07/2020. Utilizing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this research analyzes legal materials qualitatively using doctrinal interpretation and causal reasoning. The findings reveal that stock influencer liability cannot be applied uniformly; instead, conduct must be categorized into four typologies based on economic motivation, financial interest, and specific intent under Articles 90, 91, and 92 of the UUPM. Furthermore, LAPS SJK lacks direct jurisdiction over stock influencers due to their non-Financial Services Provider (non-PUJK) legal standing, requiring explicit contractual arbitration clauses or third-party joinders. The novelty of this study lies in establishing concrete liability parameters across varying degrees of influencer involvement and defining the precise jurisdictional boundaries of financial ADR forums in handling digital market disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abilah, R. C., & Rasji. (2025). Legal proof of capital market manipulation in Indonesia: Case 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst analysis. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 8(3), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i3.48431

Akalil, L. A., Ulfanora, U., & Alia, M. I. (2026). Pengaturan Hukum Tentang Penggunaan Jasa Influencer Untuk Mempromosikan Saham Dalam Upaya Memberikan Perlindungan Investor Pasar Modal. Lareh Law Review, 4(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.4.1.35-48.2026

Anggraeni, A., Rahayu, S. A. P., & Jibril, A. A. (2026). Legal certainty and legal protection: Two keys pillars of investor protection against stock manipulation by influencers following POJK No.13/2025. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v10i2.57883

Anjani, E. P., Suryanti, N., & Yuanitasari, D. (2022a). Kedudukan Influencer yang Merekomendasikan Saham Tertentu Berdasarkan Hukum Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum, 26(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v26i2.467

Anjani, E. P., Suryanti, N., & Yuanitasari, D. (2022b). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Influencer yang Merekomendasikan Saham Tertentu berdasarkan Hukum Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum, 26(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v26i2.467

Arista, T., Wardhani, N. E., & Evi. (2025). The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector in Resolving Insurance Disputes. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(5), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1999

Beltsazar, G., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2026). Stock price manipulation (pump and dump stock) and threats to Indonesian capital market classification: A legal analysis from an investor protection perspective. Journal Customary Law, 3(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5846

Edelweiss, A., Emmanuel, J., & Siregar, R. (2024). RESPONSIBILITY OF INFLUENCERS WHO CONDUCT STOCKPOMMS AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT MEASURE FOR INVESTORS. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v12i1.4855

Eryasafli, R. A., Maharani, S., & Zakwan, M. F. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan di Indonesia: Analisis Mekanisme Pengaduan Internal, Mediasi LAPSPI, dan Litigasi dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen. Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry, 1(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.65310/d70tgc86

Faradiba, N., Ginting, B., & Sidabariba, B. (2025). Legal Responsibility of Company as Issuers for Stock Value Decline Due to Lack of Information Disclosure Principles. Jurnal Mercatoria, 18(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v18i2.16567

Firdausi, I. N., & Nirawati, L. (2023). Dampak adanya influencer investor serta perilaku fear of missing out (FOMO) terhadap keputusan pembelian saham di Indonesia. Masip: Jurnal Manajemen Administrasi Bisnis Dan Publik Terapan, 1(3), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.59061/masip.v1i3.347

Gerritsen, D., & Regt, A. De. (2025). Influencers and Consumer Financial Decision-Making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(1), e70037. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70037

Guan, S. S. (2025). Securities Fraud and the Market for Individual Stocks. Columbia Business Law Review, 2025(1), 210–245. https://doi.org/10.52214/cblr.v2025i1.14251

Kaffi, M. K. A. M., & Fadli, S. (2025). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Mediasi Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.945

Keumala, D., Setiyono, & Zain, M. I. bin M. (2025). Addressing the Regulatory Gaps in Indonesian Financial Alternative Dispute Resolution. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 19(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v19i1.44761

Khairazi, R., Negara, I. P. E. W., & Pelupessy, B. E. (2026). Do Your Own Research (DYOR) and Not Financial Advice (NFA) as a liability-limiting doctrine in Indonesian capital market law. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v4i2.1197

Maulani, D. C., Febriani, R., Sari, P. P., Aida, N., Hudani, M. M., & Nindien, Q. A. (2025). Efektivitas LAPSPI Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Layanan Digital Banking Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Digital, 2(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.62379/jebd.v2i4.2790

Maulida, I. B. U., & Effendy, L. (2024). Pengaruh influencer marketing, motivasi diri, dan pengetahuan investasi terhadap pengambilan keputusan investasi saham (Studi kasus mahasiswa Universitas Mataram). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i2.516

Mulyana, S. P., & Susilawati, I. Y. (2026). KEKOSONGAN HUKUM PENGATURAN FINANCIAL INFLUENCER DALAM PROMOSI INVESTASI DIGITAL DI INDONESIA. Ganec Swara, 20(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v20i2.708

Niak, S. F. M., Kharyeki, M. F., & Vaseghi, M. (2025). Challenges of state civil liability arising from manipulation and intervention in the stock market and securities in Iranian law. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 4(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.264

Ningsih, A. S. (2023). Alternative Insitutions on Dispute Settlement For Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) in Banking Disputes. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no3.2967

Nurhayati, S., Nurjamil, & Fadhillah, M. H. (2021). Measuring Opportunities and Challenges in Dispute Resolution of Fintech Sharia Business Through LAPS. Batulis Civil Law Review, 3(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.929

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). Siaran Pers : Pasar Modal Indonesia Menguat dan Berintegritas Sepanjang 2025 , Penutupan Perdagangan Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Penutupan-Perdagangan-Bursa-Efek-Indonesia-Tahun-2025.aspx

Pahlevi, F. S. (2021). Legal standing influencer saham di Indonesia. Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law, 1(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v1i2.2908

Paranna, T. N. S., & Andersen, C. (2022). Legal Liability of Influencers or Affiliates for Stock Pumping Activities and Promoting Trading in The Form of Binary Options. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 2(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.daengku1295

Pranata, A. M., Sukarmi, & Dewantara, R. (2025). STRENGTHENING THE AUTHORITY OF LAPS SJK IN RESOLVING DIGITAL TRANSACTION DISPUTES IN INDONESIA. KANUN: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 27(3), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v27i3.45919

Putra, G. P., Prahara, D., & Mujahidin, S. A. (2026). Konvergensi Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pasar Modal dalam Penanggulangan Manipulasi Saham dan Insider Trading di Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.62007/joumi.v4i2.693

Regita, T. I. (2022). Pengaruh Influencer Saham Terhadap Minat Investasi Generasi Milenial Pada Pasar Modal. Jimek: Jurnal Ilmu Mahasiswa Ekonomi, 5(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30737/jimek.v5i1.2027

Ritonga, S., Ramlan, & Arifin, M. (2026). Investor Protection Model in Digital Retail SBSN with Sharia Compliance Assurance. Jurnal Akta, 13(2), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v13i2.51973

Rurkinantia, A., Heradhyaksa, B., Fibriani, R., Priyono, E. A., Azhar, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2026). Combating Speculative Investment through Legal and Syariah Literacy: A Community Engagement Approach for Biased Young Investors. Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v9i1.44950

Salsabilla, R., Muslim, F., Sari, S. I., Pasya, A. N., Sunarko, & Siregar, E. S. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Praktik Manipulasi Pasar oleh Influencer Saham dan Dampaknya Terhadap Investor Ritel (Studi Kasus Otoritas Jasa Keuangan terhadap Influencer BVN). Koloni, 5(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.31004/koloni.v5i2.970

Setiyono, S., Keumala, D., Zain, M. I. bin M., Rahmat, N. E., & Ilias, I. I. (2025). Indonesia and Malaysia’s Alternative Models of Dispute Resolution in the Financial Sector. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 8(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i2.12890

Singh, S., & Sarva, M. (2024). The Rise of Finfluencers: A Digital Transformation in Investment Advice. Australasian Business, Accounting and Finance Journal, 18(3), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i3.14

Siregar, E. S., Sinaga, M. A. P., Mayumi, V. I., Natasya, S., Ray, P. V., & Purba, Y. K. T. M. (2026). Rekonstruksi penyelesaian sengketa pasar modal akibat manipulasi informasi oleh finfluencer di media sosial. Journal of Science and Social Research, 9(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.54314/1fj9qb17

Susanti, A. Y., & Gayo, S. (2023). The Use of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Settlement of Banking Disputes. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(4), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230441

Wijaya, H., & Sulistianingsih, D. (2026). Comparative Study of Mediation Practices in Financial Disputes Between Indonesia’s LAPS SJK and Singapore’s FIDReC Framework. Kosmik Hukum, 2(4), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i1.29031

Wulandari, N. P. N., & Rasmini, N. K. (2024). Pengaruh influencer, motivasi, dan literasi keuangan terhadap minat investasi saham di kalangan mahasiswa. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 13(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2024.v13.i07.p01

Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Liu, S., & Wang, J. (2023). How does an online influencer manipulate the stock market? Finance Research Letters, 58, 104333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104331

Downloads

Published

2026-09-20

How to Cite

Legal Liability of Stock Influencers and Jurisdictional Constraints of Investor Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Capital Market. (2026). Law Development Journal, 8(3), 1514-1528. https://doi.org/10.30659/6spx5r84