The Formulation of a Special Minimum Criminal Threat System Formulation in the Corruption Law

Doni Cakra Gumilar, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Jawade Hafidz

Abstract


This study aims to find out how the policy for formulating a special minimum penalty system in the current Corruption Crime Law, what are the weaknesses of the policy for formulating a special minimum penalty system in the current Corruption Law and how is the policy for formulating a special minimum penalty system in the Criminal Act Future corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. Based on the research, it was concluded that the formulation policy of a special minimum penalty system in the Corruption Crime Act is currently seen as having weaknesses, including, the formulation of a special minimum sentence that is too light is seen as having hurt the sense of justice in society and there is no sentencing guideline in the Act. Current Corruption Crimes. In order to overcome the weaknesses in the formulation of a system of special minimum criminal threats in the Corruption Crime Law in the future. This can be solved by revising the policy formulation of a special minimum penalty system by increasing the minimum penalty and including specific minimum criminal penalties in the Corruption Law.


Keywords


Formulation; Criminal; Corruption; Policy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Andi Irawan Haqiqi, Jawade Hafidz, Kebijakan formulasi Sistem Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Penjara Minimum Khusus Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol. 12 No. 2 Juni 2017, h. 401 (http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id) accessed on 8 July 2021.

Antonius Sudirman, Eksistensi Pidana Minimum Khusus Sebagai Sarana Penaggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (https://ejournal.undip.ac.id) accessed on 1 July 2021.

Dey Ravena, Mencandra Hukum Progresif Dan Peran Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Unisba, (https://ejournal.unisba.ac.id.) accessed on 1 May 2021.

Ismail Rumadan, Penafsiran Hakim Terhadap Ketentuan Pidana Minimum Khusus Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 2 No. 3, November 2013, (http://www.jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org), accessen on 12 April 2021.

Satjipto Raharjo, Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. I/No. 1/ April 2005, PDIH Ilmu Hukum UNDIP.

Wahyu Beny Mukti Setiyawan, Peran Hakim Dalam Penerapan Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Dakwaan Subsidaritas Atau Alternatif, (https://media.neliti.com) accessed on 7 July 2021.

Books:

Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin, (2012), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief, (1996), Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya, Bandung.

Jawade Hafidz Arsyad, (2013), Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Romli Atmasasmita, (2001), Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Penegakan Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Salim HS and Erlies Septiana Nurbani, (2016), Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, (2018), Model Pengembangan Asas Hukum Pidana Dalam KUHP Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Ketuhan Yang Maha Esa, Fastindo, Semarang.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

The Criminal Code

The Criminal Procedure Code

Act No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes

Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Act No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes

Act No. 28 of 1999 Concerning the Administration of a State that is Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.5.1.54-70

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: