The Epistemological Errors in Regulation of Absolute Competence on Mortgage Disputes in Credit Contracts

Authors

  • Ade Saptomo Pancasila University Master of Law Program
  • Rocky Marbun Pancasila University
  • Anis Mashdurohatun Sultan Agung Islamic University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v7i1.29464

Keywords:

Epistemological Errors Credit Contracts Mortgage

Abstract

The development of Collateral Law relating to the attachment of Mortgage Rights to a Credit Agreement, nowadays, it is impossible to avoid the development of Sharia Law in Indonesia. This study tries to reveal an epistemological error from the Supreme Court which issued Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases against the phenomenon of disparity in judicial decisions on Mortgage attached to Sharia-based Credit Agreements. This study uses a normative juridical method using the Communication Speech Act approach and the Relationship Trichotomy approach. The results of this study indicate that there was an epistemological error from the Supreme Court which issued the Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016, instead of as a form of resolving legal anomalies, which showed the existence of domination based on power and authority from the Supreme Court by applying an eclecticism mechanism to rights. Dependents with Sharia-based Credit Agreements which are assumed to be true.

References

Books:

Abintoro Prakoso, 2015, Hukum, Filsafat Logika Dan Argumentasi Hukum, LaksBang Justitia, Surabaya;

Ade Saptomo, 2015, Awal Memahami Hukum, Teori Hukum & Filsafat Hukum, FHUP Press, Jakarta;

Ainur Rahmat Hidayat, 2018, Filsafat Berfikir: Teknik-Teknik Berfikir Logis Kotra Kesesatan Berpikir, Duta Media Publishing, Madura;

Bernard Arief Sidharta, 2009, Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Mandar Maju, Bandung;

Dodi Haryono, 2012, Identitas Dan Elastisitas Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila Yang Demokratis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau 1–29. Retrieved June 6, 2022, Riau;

Fernando Manullang, 2016, Legisme, Legalitas Dan Kepastian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta;

Mardanis, 2017, Gadai Syari’ah (Rahn) Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam Dan Fiqh Muamalah, Pekanbaru;

Musa Darwin Pane, and Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang, 2018, Asas-Asas Berpikir Logika Dalam Hukum, Penerbit Cakra, Bandung;

Ridwan, 2014, Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta;

Rocky Marbun, 2019, Praktik Hukum Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Membangun Landasan Kefilsafatan Dan Teoretis (Buku I), CV. Arti Bumi Intaran, Yogyakarta;

Rocky Marbun, Trichotomy of Relation Through Instrumental Communication in Pre-Adjudication Stage: The Failure of Criminal Procedure Code to Foster Law Enforcement Attitudes, the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, 2021;

Syukri Iska, 2012, Sistem Perbankan Syariah Dalam Perspektif Fikih Ekonomi, Fajar Media Press, Yogyakarta;

Teddy Lahati, 2013, Proses Hakim Dalam Membuat Putusan Mengkonstatir (Bagian I), Direktorat Jendral Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung, Jakarta;

Triamita Rahmawati, 2021, Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Jaminan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Pembiayaan Di Perbankan Syariah, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta;

Journals:

Carel Smith, The Vicissitudes of the Hermeneutic Paradigm in the Study of Law: Tradition, Forms of Life and Metaphor, Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019;

Cekli Setya Pratiwi, Kegagalan Mewujudkan Keadilan Prosedural Dan Substansial Dalam Putusan Hakim Tinggi Perkara Tindak Pidana Psikotropika Nomor: 25/Pid/B/2010/PT Sby, Humanity, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2013;

Elif Acar, Sugeng Sudrajat, Effectiveness of Applying Principles of Legal Certainty of Justice In The Handling of Criminal Case, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. V, No. 3, Sepember-Desember 2018;

Ifa Latifa Fitriani, Jaminan Dan Agunan Dalam Pembiayaan Bank Syariah Dan Kredit Bank Konvensional, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2017;

Insyafli, Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Melaksanakan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, Pengadilan Tinggi Pekanbaru, Vol. 5, 2015;

Muntoha, Demokrasi Dan Negara Hukum, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009;

Nelly Mulia Husma, Faisal A. Rani, and Syarifuddin Hasyim, Kewenangan Pengaturan Mahkamah Agung (Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Tentang Larangan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Praperadilan), Syiah Kuala Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2017;

Rocky Marbun, Konferensi Pers Dan Operasi Tangkap Tangan Sebagai Dominasi Simbolik : Membongkar Kesesatan Berpikir Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Press Conference And Hand Catch Operations As Symbolic Domination : Dismantling Fallacy In Criminal Law Enforcement, Ius Constituendum, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2022;

Urbanus Ura Weruin, Logika, Penalaran, Dan Argumentasi Huku, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-18

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): International Journal of Law Reconstruction

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).